[新聞]正妹爆料運將「恐怖計程車」被告!吵1年大結局:都無罪消失
ETNEWS
2.完整新聞標題:
正妹爆料運將「恐怖計程車」被告!吵1年大結局:都無罪
3.完整新聞內文:
台北市呂姓女子去年陪酒醉閨密搭小黃,卻爆發「恐怖計程車」羅生門事
件,吵了1年,結果終於出爐!當初她PO文指控大都會運將林茂榮亂繞路、
意圖不軌,對方提告妨害名譽,她也反咬妨害自由等,因處分不起訴,林提
起再議;高檢署調查認定呂女無犯意,而林男的理由也只是臆測,駁回再
議,全案確定。
事發於2015年6月12日,呂女在「爆怨公社」發文指控,陪酒醉閨密搭小
黃,上車後睡著,醒來後發現車不是開往新莊,而是基隆,周旋後改前往汐
止阿姨家,她還拿出電擊棒自保,對方才放人。事後業者不僅出示錄音檔、
行徑軌跡、遠通etag收費紀錄澄清,呂女仍堅持報案,讓林茂榮夫妻按鈴控
告,鬧上法院。
「從6月12號這天開始,是我先生和我的孩子這輩子最痛苦,也最煎熬的開
始。」林姓夫妻沉痛指出,呂女捏造不實內容,經網路瘋傳,嚴重毀謗家人
清白和名譽,因此採取法律途徑,捍衛自身權利。呂女向士林地檢署控告運
將妨害自由、詐欺,林男則向台北地檢署提告誣告、妨害名譽等。
士林地檢署調查,發現呂女在車上打了21通電話,給丈夫、阿姨、父親和外
婆追查衛星定位,發現雙方對行車位置有誤解,女方不知高速公路走往基隆
方向,是去新莊的正常路線,導致一連串的誤會,且沒有證人作證情形下,
以罪證不足處分不起訴,但呂女不服,向高檢署提起再議。
至於林男部分,台北地檢署認為,「誤會一場」,呂女只是認知錯誤,沒有
誣告犯意,同樣處分不起訴,林也向高檢署提起再議。《蘋果日報》報導,
如今1年過去,結果終於出爐,高檢署調查認為,北檢偵查完備,林男再議
理由純屬臆測,呂女無犯意,最後雙方再議都被駁回,全案確定。
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
http://www.ettoday.net/news/20170614/945225.htm
5.備註:
覺得這位運將很可憐,不過還是可以提民事訴訟,尤其是對爆尿公社和該名女子。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.116.131.63
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1497456345.A.141.html
→
06/15 00:05, , 1F
06/15 00:05, 1F
→
06/15 00:06, , 2F
06/15 00:06, 2F
→
06/15 00:06, , 3F
06/15 00:06, 3F
→
06/15 00:06, , 4F
06/15 00:06, 4F
推
06/15 00:07, , 5F
06/15 00:07, 5F
推
06/15 00:07, , 6F
06/15 00:07, 6F
→
06/15 00:07, , 7F
06/15 00:07, 7F
→
06/15 00:07, , 8F
06/15 00:07, 8F
推
06/15 00:07, , 9F
06/15 00:07, 9F
→
06/15 00:07, , 10F
06/15 00:07, 10F
→
06/15 00:08, , 11F
06/15 00:08, 11F
→
06/15 00:08, , 12F
06/15 00:08, 12F
噓
06/15 00:08, , 13F
06/15 00:08, 13F
推
06/15 00:09, , 14F
06/15 00:09, 14F
推
06/15 00:09, , 15F
06/15 00:09, 15F
推
06/15 00:09, , 16F
06/15 00:09, 16F
推
06/15 00:10, , 17F
06/15 00:10, 17F

→
06/15 00:10, , 18F
06/15 00:10, 18F
推
06/15 00:11, , 19F
06/15 00:11, 19F
噓
06/15 00:11, , 20F
06/15 00:11, 20F
→
06/15 00:13, , 21F
06/15 00:13, 21F
推
06/15 00:14, , 22F
06/15 00:14, 22F
推
06/15 00:14, , 23F
06/15 00:14, 23F
→
06/15 00:15, , 24F
06/15 00:15, 24F
推
06/15 00:16, , 25F
06/15 00:16, 25F
推
06/15 00:16, , 26F
06/15 00:16, 26F
噓
06/15 00:16, , 27F
06/15 00:16, 27F
→
06/15 00:16, , 28F
06/15 00:16, 28F
→
06/15 00:16, , 29F
06/15 00:16, 29F
推
06/15 00:18, , 30F
06/15 00:18, 30F
→
06/15 00:19, , 31F
06/15 00:19, 31F
推
06/15 00:22, , 32F
06/15 00:22, 32F
→
06/15 00:24, , 33F
06/15 00:24, 33F
推
06/15 00:27, , 34F
06/15 00:27, 34F
推
06/15 00:32, , 35F
06/15 00:32, 35F
噓
06/15 00:37, , 36F
06/15 00:37, 36F
推
06/15 00:47, , 37F
06/15 00:47, 37F
噓
06/15 00:47, , 38F
06/15 00:47, 38F
→
06/15 00:49, , 39F
06/15 00:49, 39F
推
06/15 00:51, , 40F
06/15 00:51, 40F
→
06/15 00:53, , 41F
06/15 00:53, 41F
推
06/15 00:54, , 42F
06/15 00:54, 42F
→
06/15 00:54, , 43F
06/15 00:54, 43F
→
06/15 00:57, , 44F
06/15 00:57, 44F
→
06/15 00:57, , 45F
06/15 00:57, 45F
噓
06/15 01:11, , 46F
06/15 01:11, 46F
噓
06/15 01:23, , 47F
06/15 01:23, 47F
推
06/15 01:24, , 48F
06/15 01:24, 48F
推
06/15 01:28, , 49F
06/15 01:28, 49F
推
06/15 01:42, , 50F
06/15 01:42, 50F
噓
06/15 01:55, , 51F
06/15 01:55, 51F
→
06/15 01:56, , 52F
06/15 01:56, 52F
推
06/15 02:10, , 53F
06/15 02:10, 53F
→
06/15 02:13, , 54F
06/15 02:13, 54F
→
06/15 07:44, , 55F
06/15 07:44, 55F
噓
06/15 08:13, , 56F
06/15 08:13, 56F
推
06/15 11:05, , 57F
06/15 11:05, 57F
→
06/15 11:06, , 58F
06/15 11:06, 58F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):