[問卦] 禁止水泥出口減少產量可行嗎??消失
最近亞泥炒得很火熱
GOOGLE一下看到十年前壹周刊舊聞
http://share.youthwant.com.tw/D62066380.html
500億水泥暴利 徐旭東摧毀國家公園◎壹週刊
其中一段
" 水泥業不但高污染,還是高耗電的產業,
光是生產一噸的水泥就要耗掉一百二十七度的電力
,而花蓮水泥、礦場林立污染可見一斑。"
然後又看到亞泥官網公司簡介:
" 亞泥成立於 1957 年,為台灣第二大水泥廠商,年產能 500 萬噸,
市佔率約 26%,內外銷比重約 6:4,外銷銷往亞洲、非洲、美洲。 "
水泥是耗材是國土挖掉一噸就少一噸,國內建設要挖不好反駁,
但禁止外銷總有道理吧,憑甚麼把國土賣掉圖利商人,
不能禁止開採禁止出口總有辦法吧!!再不行提高出口關稅讓他無利可圖,
而且禁外銷的四成水泥就兩百萬噸,
一年還可以省下200萬*127=2.54億度電。
網路查到:假設冷氣耗電功率是(1.2噸)812W,可是實際的效耗大約是在60%,
因為設定的溫度.25度高於室溫,它的壓縮機就沒運轉了,只有送風機在運轉,
所以它的效耗電能大約812w的60%=490w
冷氣耗電量490w*8小時=3920w*h=3.92KW=3.92度
2.54億度電/3.92/90=719954.6...
就是說光禁止亞泥出口水泥減少的電力就可以讓近72萬戶人一天開八小時
開一個夏天3個月吹冷氣睡好眠了
不僅可以保護國土還可以節能減碳,台電限電壓力可以減少不少吧。
怎麼看禁止出口水泥都利大於弊!!而且正當!!
問題是怎麼都沒有立委提案修法??
是有甚麼困難想不到嗎??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 115.165.195.165
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1497190702.A.385.html
→
06/11 22:18, , 1F
06/11 22:18, 1F
→ meredith001: 有差嗎? 那邊什麼沒有 電最多阿 06/11 22:18
→
06/11 22:18, , 2F
06/11 22:18, 2F
噓
06/11 22:19, , 3F
06/11 22:19, 3F
推
06/11 22:19, , 4F
06/11 22:19, 4F
→
06/11 22:19, , 5F
06/11 22:19, 5F
要禁當然一起禁~~電省更多!!
→
06/11 22:19, , 6F
06/11 22:19, 6F
→
06/11 22:19, , 7F
06/11 22:19, 7F
→
06/11 22:20, , 8F
06/11 22:20, 8F
噓
06/11 22:20, , 9F
06/11 22:20, 9F
推
06/11 22:21, , 10F
06/11 22:21, 10F
推
06/11 22:21, , 11F
06/11 22:21, 11F
→
06/11 22:21, , 12F
06/11 22:21, 12F
推
06/11 22:21, , 13F
06/11 22:21, 13F
→
06/11 22:22, , 14F
06/11 22:22, 14F
→
06/11 22:22, , 15F
06/11 22:22, 15F
→
06/11 22:22, , 16F
06/11 22:22, 16F
→
06/11 22:22, , 17F
06/11 22:22, 17F
不一樣吧!!台灣有產石油嗎??但要禁應該可以~~國內夠用就好~~
推
06/11 22:22, , 18F
06/11 22:22, 18F
推
06/11 22:22, , 19F
06/11 22:22, 19F
推
06/11 22:23, , 20F
06/11 22:23, 20F
推
06/11 22:24, , 21F
06/11 22:24, 21F
推
06/11 22:24, , 22F
06/11 22:24, 22F
推
06/11 22:24, , 23F
06/11 22:24, 23F
推
06/11 22:24, , 24F
06/11 22:24, 24F
推
06/11 22:24, , 25F
06/11 22:24, 25F
→
06/11 22:25, , 26F
06/11 22:25, 26F
推
06/11 22:27, , 27F
06/11 22:27, 27F
推
06/11 22:27, , 28F
06/11 22:27, 28F
推
06/11 22:29, , 29F
06/11 22:29, 29F
推
06/11 22:29, , 30F
06/11 22:29, 30F
推
06/11 22:29, , 31F
06/11 22:29, 31F
→
06/11 22:29, , 32F
06/11 22:29, 32F
→
06/11 22:29, , 33F
06/11 22:29, 33F
推
06/11 22:29, , 34F
06/11 22:29, 34F
推
06/11 22:30, , 35F
06/11 22:30, 35F
→
06/11 22:31, , 36F
06/11 22:31, 36F
還有 20 則推文
還有 1 段內文
推
06/11 23:04, , 57F
06/11 23:04, 57F
推
06/11 23:05, , 58F
06/11 23:05, 58F
→
06/11 23:14, , 59F
06/11 23:14, 59F
推
06/11 23:15, , 60F
06/11 23:15, 60F
推
06/11 23:22, , 61F
06/11 23:22, 61F
推
06/11 23:24, , 62F
06/11 23:24, 62F
→
06/11 23:25, , 63F
06/11 23:25, 63F
推
06/11 23:32, , 64F
06/11 23:32, 64F
噓
06/11 23:33, , 65F
06/11 23:33, 65F
→
06/11 23:35, , 66F
06/11 23:35, 66F
推 crt0921: 推 06/11 23:46
→
06/11 23:49, , 67F
06/11 23:49, 67F
→
06/11 23:51, , 68F
06/11 23:51, 68F
推
06/11 23:51, , 69F
06/11 23:51, 69F
推
06/11 23:55, , 70F
06/11 23:55, 70F
噓
06/11 23:56, , 71F
06/11 23:56, 71F
推
06/11 23:57, , 72F
06/11 23:57, 72F
→
06/11 23:57, , 73F
06/11 23:57, 73F
噓
06/11 23:59, , 74F
06/11 23:59, 74F
※ 編輯: DREE (115.165.195.165), 06/12/2017 00:08:40
推
06/12 00:13, , 75F
06/12 00:13, 75F
推
06/12 00:14, , 76F
06/12 00:14, 76F
推
06/12 00:18, , 77F
06/12 00:18, 77F
推
06/12 00:20, , 78F
06/12 00:20, 78F
推
06/12 00:25, , 79F
06/12 00:25, 79F
推
06/12 00:25, , 80F
06/12 00:25, 80F
推
06/12 00:28, , 81F
06/12 00:28, 81F
推
06/12 01:13, , 82F
06/12 01:13, 82F
推
06/12 01:35, , 83F
06/12 01:35, 83F
推
06/12 02:04, , 84F
06/12 02:04, 84F
推
06/12 02:57, , 85F
06/12 02:57, 85F
推
06/12 07:30, , 86F
06/12 07:30, 86F
噓
06/12 07:31, , 87F
06/12 07:31, 87F
推
06/12 08:48, , 88F
06/12 08:48, 88F
推
06/12 09:09, , 89F
06/12 09:09, 89F
→
06/12 10:18, , 90F
06/12 10:18, 90F
推
06/12 10:54, , 91F
06/12 10:54, 91F
推
06/12 11:36, , 92F
06/12 11:36, 92F
推
06/12 12:03, , 93F
06/12 12:03, 93F
推
06/12 19:17, , 94F
06/12 19:17, 94F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):