Re: [新聞] 警大錄取分數狂掉 葉毓蘭:40年來最大滑落消失
題外話,以警大生的素質(那些連警大都不是就當警察的就更...)
讓這些笨蛋配槍真的好嗎?
當然,身負危險任務的警察配槍很合理
但沒必要連路邊開單的警察都配吧
略懂警察體系的都知道
會在路上開單的都是最廢最笨的
才會被分派去開單
這些人開單時不太可能需要用槍吧...
那配大量的槍枝給這些智力低於平均水準的人
真的好嗎....
只怕哪天出來亂射也說不定
只能說台灣的體制怪畸形的
應該要具有水準的工作
基本上篩選機制都篩出不太適任的人
例如國小國中老師
以前主要都是給唸教育大學的人來當
那教育大學有多好考就莫再提了@@
大概就是一般人考到就會想重考的分數吧
然後身負社會安定重任的警察
又都是一些....
學測考5,60的 ___兒
或是一些看起來很文弱的書生/女生
遇到危險真的有得打嗎??
不過相較鬼島其他令人不敢置信的怪事
大家也只能默默忍受囉
在路上遇到警察就閃遠點吧
基本上都低智力
要是哪個剛好有神經病
配槍就拿出來射囉~
可怕
好可怕
-----
Sent from JPTT on my Asus ASUS_Z012DA.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.217.64.192
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1496026692.A.998.html
→
05/29 10:59, , 1F
05/29 10:59, 1F
推
05/29 11:00, , 2F
05/29 11:00, 2F
反正應該都是笨蛋吧?
還要我花時間了解這個白癡體系?
※ 編輯: kevincheng95 (180.217.64.192), 05/29/2017 11:00:57
推
05/29 11:00, , 3F
05/29 11:00, 3F
推
05/29 11:00, , 4F
05/29 11:00, 4F
推
05/29 11:00, , 5F
05/29 11:00, 5F
→
05/29 11:01, , 6F
05/29 11:01, 6F
→
05/29 11:01, , 7F
05/29 11:01, 7F
→
05/29 11:02, , 8F
05/29 11:02, 8F
推
05/29 11:02, , 9F
05/29 11:02, 9F
→
05/29 11:03, , 10F
05/29 11:03, 10F
推
05/29 11:06, , 11F
05/29 11:06, 11F
推
05/29 11:06, , 12F
05/29 11:06, 12F
推
05/29 11:06, , 13F
05/29 11:06, 13F
→
05/29 11:07, , 14F
05/29 11:07, 14F
推
05/29 11:09, , 15F
05/29 11:09, 15F
...沒吧 都一樣簡單吧
推
05/29 11:10, , 16F
05/29 11:10, 16F
※ 編輯: kevincheng95 (180.217.64.192), 05/29/2017 11:12:40
推
05/29 11:12, , 17F
05/29 11:12, 17F
推
05/29 11:12, , 18F
05/29 11:12, 18F
推
05/29 11:13, , 19F
05/29 11:13, 19F
推
05/29 11:14, , 20F
05/29 11:14, 20F
噓
05/29 11:14, , 21F
05/29 11:14, 21F
推
05/29 11:15, , 22F
05/29 11:15, 22F
→
05/29 11:16, , 23F
05/29 11:16, 23F
噓
05/29 11:17, , 24F
05/29 11:17, 24F
噓
05/29 11:18, , 25F
05/29 11:18, 25F
→
05/29 11:18, , 26F
05/29 11:18, 26F
推
05/29 11:18, , 27F
05/29 11:18, 27F
推
05/29 11:20, , 28F
05/29 11:20, 28F
噓
05/29 11:20, , 29F
05/29 11:20, 29F
噓
05/29 11:21, , 30F
05/29 11:21, 30F
噓
05/29 11:21, , 31F
05/29 11:21, 31F
噓
05/29 11:21, , 32F
05/29 11:21, 32F
→
05/29 11:21, , 33F
05/29 11:21, 33F
噓
05/29 11:22, , 34F
05/29 11:22, 34F
推
05/29 11:22, , 35F
05/29 11:22, 35F
→
05/29 11:22, , 36F
05/29 11:22, 36F
噓
05/29 11:23, , 37F
05/29 11:23, 37F
推
05/29 11:23, , 38F
05/29 11:23, 38F
→
05/29 11:24, , 39F
05/29 11:24, 39F
噓
05/29 11:24, , 40F
05/29 11:24, 40F
→
05/29 11:24, , 41F
05/29 11:24, 41F
→
05/29 11:28, , 42F
05/29 11:28, 42F
→
05/29 11:29, , 43F
05/29 11:29, 43F
推
05/29 11:30, , 44F
05/29 11:30, 44F
→
05/29 11:30, , 45F
05/29 11:30, 45F
噓
05/29 11:30, , 46F
05/29 11:30, 46F
推
05/29 11:31, , 47F
05/29 11:31, 47F
噓
05/29 11:32, , 48F
05/29 11:32, 48F
噓
05/29 11:33, , 49F
05/29 11:33, 49F
噓
05/29 11:37, , 50F
05/29 11:37, 50F
噓
05/29 11:38, , 51F
05/29 11:38, 51F
→
05/29 11:39, , 52F
05/29 11:39, 52F
噓
05/29 12:16, , 53F
05/29 12:16, 53F
推
05/29 12:39, , 54F
05/29 12:39, 54F
噓
05/29 12:41, , 55F
05/29 12:41, 55F
推
05/29 12:49, , 56F
05/29 12:49, 56F
推
05/29 13:24, , 57F
05/29 13:24, 57F
噓
05/29 13:39, , 58F
05/29 13:39, 58F
噓
05/29 13:43, , 59F
05/29 13:43, 59F
噓
05/29 13:51, , 60F
05/29 13:51, 60F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 11 篇):