[問卦] 74團可接受檢察官不起訴的理由嗎?消失
如題
74團認為有交往不一定沒有強姦
這邏輯確實合理
因為連夫妻都可以有強暴了
更何況是男女朋友呢
但按照一樣的邏輯
陳星第一時間不出面
也不代表他有犯罪心虛把
套一句林奕含的名言
難道被性侵一定要哭哭啼啼的嗎?
女生有複雜的防衛機制好嗎?
那陳星就不能有他自己的防衛機制嗎?
難道被抹黑,就一定要跳出來解釋嗎?
還有
我也不知道74團怎麼看
檢察官對性侵不起訴的新聞
基本上不起訴案件
多半是完事後一起有親密舉動或是一起吃早餐
所以檢察官認為犯罪事實不足
這時74團是不是又要跳出來說
女生複雜防衛機制
讓人家想跟強暴犯吃早餐不行逆
你沒看過我幫強暴犯作早餐那張圖嗎?
所以74團是認為
所有檢察官因為
女生和男生的親密舉動不起訴的案件
都是檢察官亂辦案嗎?
有沒有人可以跟我解釋一下?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.136.79.77
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1495210833.A.80D.html
→
05/20 00:21, , 1F
05/20 00:21, 1F
推
05/20 00:21, , 2F
05/20 00:21, 2F
推
05/20 00:21, , 3F
05/20 00:21, 3F
噓
05/20 00:21, , 4F
05/20 00:21, 4F
→
05/20 00:21, , 5F
05/20 00:21, 5F
噓
05/20 00:21, , 6F
05/20 00:21, 6F
→
05/20 00:21, , 7F
05/20 00:21, 7F
→
05/20 00:22, , 8F
05/20 00:22, 8F
推
05/20 00:22, , 9F
05/20 00:22, 9F
→
05/20 00:22, , 10F
05/20 00:22, 10F
推
05/20 00:22, , 11F
05/20 00:22, 11F
推
05/20 00:23, , 12F
05/20 00:23, 12F
→
05/20 00:23, , 13F
05/20 00:23, 13F
推
05/20 00:23, , 14F
05/20 00:23, 14F
推
05/20 00:24, , 15F
05/20 00:24, 15F
→
05/20 00:24, , 16F
05/20 00:24, 16F
→
05/20 00:24, , 17F
05/20 00:24, 17F
推
05/20 00:24, , 18F
05/20 00:24, 18F
推
05/20 00:24, , 19F
05/20 00:24, 19F
推
05/20 00:25, , 20F
05/20 00:25, 20F
→
05/20 00:25, , 21F
05/20 00:25, 21F
噓
05/20 00:25, , 22F
05/20 00:25, 22F
→
05/20 00:25, , 23F
05/20 00:25, 23F
→
05/20 00:25, , 24F
05/20 00:25, 24F
推
05/20 00:25, , 25F
05/20 00:25, 25F
推
05/20 00:26, , 26F
05/20 00:26, 26F
→
05/20 00:26, , 27F
05/20 00:26, 27F
推
05/20 00:26, , 28F
05/20 00:26, 28F
推
05/20 00:26, , 29F
05/20 00:26, 29F
→
05/20 00:27, , 30F
05/20 00:27, 30F
→
05/20 00:27, , 31F
05/20 00:27, 31F
推
05/20 00:29, , 32F
05/20 00:29, 32F
推
05/20 00:29, , 33F
05/20 00:29, 33F
推
05/20 00:29, , 34F
05/20 00:29, 34F
推
05/20 00:29, , 35F
05/20 00:29, 35F
→
05/20 00:30, , 36F
05/20 00:30, 36F
噓
05/20 00:30, , 37F
05/20 00:30, 37F
→
05/20 00:30, , 38F
05/20 00:30, 38F
推
05/20 00:31, , 39F
05/20 00:31, 39F
推
05/20 00:38, , 40F
05/20 00:38, 40F
→
05/20 00:39, , 41F
05/20 00:39, 41F
推
05/20 00:42, , 42F
05/20 00:42, 42F
推
05/20 00:43, , 43F
05/20 00:43, 43F
→
05/20 00:43, , 44F
05/20 00:43, 44F
→
05/20 00:43, , 45F
05/20 00:43, 45F
噓
05/20 00:46, , 46F
05/20 00:46, 46F
→
05/20 00:53, , 47F
05/20 00:53, 47F
噓
05/20 00:58, , 48F
05/20 00:58, 48F
噓
05/20 01:38, , 49F
05/20 01:38, 49F
推
05/20 03:15, , 50F
05/20 03:15, 50F
推
05/20 15:51, , 51F
05/20 15:51, 51F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):