[問卦] 有聽過高學歷的溫拿說學歷無用論嗎消失
大家午安,
本帥突然想到,
社會上常常有一些人鼓吹學歷無用論,
學店的學歷先不討論,
常常看到文章報導xxx僱用了以前的第一名,或者讀哪間學店畢業後當老闆僱了哪間好大學畢業生當員工,
又或者台清交成的學生犯了什麼罪,一群人就會跳出來說學歷根本沒用啊之類的。
社會上好像都隱隱約約歧視讀書讀得好的人。
本帥就在想啊,這些學歷無用論的人好像自己學歷都不怎麼好看。
於是我很好奇,有沒有人是擁有很棒的學歷然後靠著學歷變成社會溫拿然後主張學歷沒有用的?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.171.185.166
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1494139285.A.77F.html
→
05/07 14:41, , 1F
05/07 14:41, 1F
推
05/07 14:41, , 2F
05/07 14:41, 2F
推
05/07 14:41, , 3F
05/07 14:41, 3F
→
05/07 14:42, , 4F
05/07 14:42, 4F
推
05/07 14:42, , 5F
05/07 14:42, 5F
→
05/07 14:42, , 6F
05/07 14:42, 6F
推
05/07 14:42, , 7F
05/07 14:42, 7F
→
05/07 14:42, , 8F
05/07 14:42, 8F
→
05/07 14:42, , 9F
05/07 14:42, 9F
推
05/07 14:42, , 10F
05/07 14:42, 10F
→
05/07 14:43, , 11F
05/07 14:43, 11F
→
05/07 14:43, , 12F
05/07 14:43, 12F
推
05/07 14:44, , 13F
05/07 14:44, 13F
推
05/07 14:44, , 14F
05/07 14:44, 14F
推
05/07 14:44, , 15F
05/07 14:44, 15F
→
05/07 14:45, , 16F
05/07 14:45, 16F
→
05/07 14:45, , 17F
05/07 14:45, 17F
推
05/07 14:46, , 18F
05/07 14:46, 18F
推
05/07 14:47, , 19F
05/07 14:47, 19F
→
05/07 14:47, , 20F
05/07 14:47, 20F
推
05/07 14:47, , 21F
05/07 14:47, 21F
推
05/07 14:50, , 22F
05/07 14:50, 22F
推
05/07 14:50, , 23F
05/07 14:50, 23F
推
05/07 14:51, , 24F
05/07 14:51, 24F
推
05/07 14:51, , 25F
05/07 14:51, 25F
推
05/07 14:52, , 26F
05/07 14:52, 26F
→
05/07 14:52, , 27F
05/07 14:52, 27F
推
05/07 14:52, , 28F
05/07 14:52, 28F
→
05/07 14:52, , 29F
05/07 14:52, 29F
噓
05/07 14:52, , 30F
05/07 14:52, 30F
→
05/07 14:52, , 31F
05/07 14:52, 31F
推
05/07 14:53, , 32F
05/07 14:53, 32F
推
05/07 14:57, , 33F
05/07 14:57, 33F
推
05/07 14:59, , 34F
05/07 14:59, 34F
推
05/07 15:03, , 35F
05/07 15:03, 35F
→
05/07 15:07, , 36F
05/07 15:07, 36F
推
05/07 15:12, , 37F
05/07 15:12, 37F
→
05/07 15:12, , 38F
05/07 15:12, 38F
→
05/07 15:12, , 39F
05/07 15:12, 39F
噓
05/07 15:37, , 40F
05/07 15:37, 40F
推
05/07 15:37, , 41F
05/07 15:37, 41F
→
05/07 15:37, , 42F
05/07 15:37, 42F
推
05/07 15:43, , 43F
05/07 15:43, 43F
→
05/07 15:43, , 44F
05/07 15:43, 44F
→
05/07 16:24, , 45F
05/07 16:24, 45F
推
05/07 16:26, , 46F
05/07 16:26, 46F
→
05/07 16:39, , 47F
05/07 16:39, 47F
→
05/07 16:51, , 48F
05/07 16:51, 48F
推
05/07 16:54, , 49F
05/07 16:54, 49F
→
05/07 16:58, , 50F
05/07 16:58, 50F
→
05/07 16:59, , 51F
05/07 16:59, 51F
→
05/07 16:59, , 52F
05/07 16:59, 52F
→
05/07 17:00, , 53F
05/07 17:00, 53F
→
05/07 17:00, , 54F
05/07 17:00, 54F
→
05/07 17:07, , 55F
05/07 17:07, 55F
推
05/07 18:34, , 56F
05/07 18:34, 56F
→
05/07 18:35, , 57F
05/07 18:35, 57F
→
05/07 18:37, , 58F
05/07 18:37, 58F
推
05/07 18:38, , 59F
05/07 18:38, 59F
→
05/07 18:39, , 60F
05/07 18:39, 60F
推
05/07 18:44, , 61F
05/07 18:44, 61F
→
05/07 18:44, , 62F
05/07 18:44, 62F
噓
05/07 19:04, , 63F
05/07 19:04, 63F
推
05/07 20:03, , 64F
05/07 20:03, 64F
噓
05/07 20:25, , 65F
05/07 20:25, 65F
→
05/07 20:25, , 66F
05/07 20:25, 66F
→
05/07 20:26, , 67F
05/07 20:26, 67F
推
05/07 20:53, , 68F
05/07 20:53, 68F
→
05/07 21:26, , 69F
05/07 21:26, 69F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 9 篇):