[新聞] 怨薪水低買不起房? 年輕學生批因年輕人只懂享樂消失
怨薪水低買不起房? 年輕學生批因年輕人只懂享樂
https://udn.com/news/story/7238/2412953?from=udn-ch1_breaknews-1-0-news
2017-04-19 16:37聯合新聞網 綜合報導
台北買房何止大不易,甚至比登天還難!根據近期內政部營建署所公佈的2016第三季「房價
負擔能力」調查,民眾平均得花9.35年不吃不喝才買得起一間房子,寸土寸金的台北更要15
年。不少年輕人抱怨,早就放棄買房了!不過對此有網友在mobile01發文分析,會造成年輕
人買不起房,根本原因是年輕人只懂得享受卻不懂儲蓄。
這名25歲的學生網友在mobile01發文表示,自己周圍的同學和朋友月薪都有3萬左右,卻沒
聽到跟自己一樣年輕的朋友有買房的打算,只見朋友一天到晚玩樂、出國、購物、吃大餐等
等,一出新的蘋果手機就趕緊搶購,完全把薪水花光光,連個存錢習慣都沒有,卻還一直批
評政府跟房市。
結果這位25歲網友的PO文引來眾怒,有網友回應說:「儲蓄跟房價貴是兩件事情,如果儲蓄
就可以買得起房子的話就不會有人怪房價高了!」也有人表示,就算原PO慢慢存,人生只會
變成不斷的存錢最後仍然買不到房子的窘況。
有網友更拿年輕人買iPhone例子打臉原PO,他說iPhone申辦高額月租費,每個月月繳也才不
到兩千元,且年年換iPhone,舊款iPhone二手轉賣還有萬元的回收,等於花在iPhone手機上
一年支出不到兩萬,若非雙北的一坪房價都足夠換十支iPhone。
儘管該篇文章受到眾人抨擊,但原PO回應說,他雖然不覺得年輕人就該當房奴,但他認為年
輕人就是不該把每個月2、3萬的月薪全花在娛樂消遣上。他更認為,年輕人與其抱怨薪水低
,不如多花時間,找找看有無其他賺錢的機會。最後他說:存款不一定可以買房,但是不存
錢永遠買不了房!
--
╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴
▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
▕ 太陽系絕對防衛線 ▏
▕ Gunbuster ▏
 ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.225.126.189
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1492602803.A.DCE.html
噓
04/19 19:53, , 1F
04/19 19:53, 1F
→
04/19 19:54, , 2F
04/19 19:54, 2F
推
04/19 19:54, , 3F
04/19 19:54, 3F
噓
04/19 19:54, , 4F
04/19 19:54, 4F
推
04/19 19:54, , 5F
04/19 19:54, 5F
推
04/19 19:54, , 6F
04/19 19:54, 6F
噓
04/19 19:55, , 7F
04/19 19:55, 7F
噓
04/19 19:55, , 8F
04/19 19:55, 8F
→
04/19 19:55, , 9F
04/19 19:55, 9F
噓
04/19 19:55, , 10F
04/19 19:55, 10F
→
04/19 19:55, , 11F
04/19 19:55, 11F
→
04/19 19:55, , 12F
04/19 19:55, 12F
噓
04/19 19:55, , 13F
04/19 19:55, 13F
推
04/19 19:56, , 14F
04/19 19:56, 14F
推
04/19 19:56, , 15F
04/19 19:56, 15F
→
04/19 19:56, , 16F
04/19 19:56, 16F
噓
04/19 19:57, , 17F
04/19 19:57, 17F
推
04/19 19:57, , 18F
04/19 19:57, 18F
→
04/19 19:57, , 19F
04/19 19:57, 19F
推
04/19 19:57, , 20F
04/19 19:57, 20F
噓
04/19 19:57, , 21F
04/19 19:57, 21F
噓
04/19 19:57, , 22F
04/19 19:57, 22F
推
04/19 19:57, , 23F
04/19 19:57, 23F
→
04/19 19:58, , 24F
04/19 19:58, 24F
→
04/19 19:58, , 25F
04/19 19:58, 25F
噓
04/19 19:58, , 26F
04/19 19:58, 26F
推
04/19 19:58, , 27F
04/19 19:58, 27F
噓
04/19 19:58, , 28F
04/19 19:58, 28F
推
04/19 19:58, , 29F
04/19 19:58, 29F
推
04/19 19:59, , 30F
04/19 19:59, 30F
→
04/19 19:59, , 31F
04/19 19:59, 31F
推
04/19 19:59, , 32F
04/19 19:59, 32F
噓
04/19 19:59, , 33F
04/19 19:59, 33F
→
04/19 19:59, , 34F
04/19 19:59, 34F
噓
04/19 19:59, , 35F
04/19 19:59, 35F
推
04/19 20:00, , 36F
04/19 20:00, 36F
推
04/19 20:00, , 37F
04/19 20:00, 37F
推
04/19 20:00, , 38F
04/19 20:00, 38F
噓
04/19 20:00, , 39F
04/19 20:00, 39F
噓
04/19 20:01, , 40F
04/19 20:01, 40F
噓
04/19 20:01, , 41F
04/19 20:01, 41F
→
04/19 20:01, , 42F
04/19 20:01, 42F
推
04/19 20:02, , 43F
04/19 20:02, 43F
推
04/19 20:02, , 44F
04/19 20:02, 44F
噓
04/19 20:03, , 45F
04/19 20:03, 45F
→
04/19 20:03, , 46F
04/19 20:03, 46F
→
04/19 20:03, , 47F
04/19 20:03, 47F
→
04/19 20:04, , 48F
04/19 20:04, 48F
→
04/19 20:05, , 49F
04/19 20:05, 49F
→
04/19 20:05, , 50F
04/19 20:05, 50F
噓
04/19 20:05, , 51F
04/19 20:05, 51F
推
04/19 20:06, , 52F
04/19 20:06, 52F
噓
04/19 20:06, , 53F
04/19 20:06, 53F
→
04/19 20:06, , 54F
04/19 20:06, 54F
→
04/19 20:06, , 55F
04/19 20:06, 55F
→
04/19 20:06, , 56F
04/19 20:06, 56F
推
04/19 20:11, , 57F
04/19 20:11, 57F
→
04/19 20:12, , 58F
04/19 20:12, 58F
噓
04/19 20:12, , 59F
04/19 20:12, 59F
→
04/19 20:12, , 60F
04/19 20:12, 60F
→
04/19 20:13, , 61F
04/19 20:13, 61F
→
04/19 20:15, , 62F
04/19 20:15, 62F
噓
04/19 20:16, , 63F
04/19 20:16, 63F
推
04/19 20:16, , 64F
04/19 20:16, 64F
→
04/19 20:17, , 65F
04/19 20:17, 65F
噓
04/19 20:18, , 66F
04/19 20:18, 66F
→
04/19 20:18, , 67F
04/19 20:18, 67F
→
04/19 20:19, , 68F
04/19 20:19, 68F
噓
04/19 20:20, , 69F
04/19 20:20, 69F
推
04/19 20:40, , 70F
04/19 20:40, 70F
噓
04/19 20:48, , 71F
04/19 20:48, 71F
→
04/19 21:00, , 72F
04/19 21:00, 72F
推
04/19 21:23, , 73F
04/19 21:23, 73F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):