[問卦] 梅豔芳跟王菲的地位誰比較高?消失
兩者都是香港無可取代的天后級歌手
梅豔芳key比較低, 有時候還可以到男生的key
被稱作香港的女兒, 根本是個傳奇人物
不過梅艷芳一直遺憾她一輩子沒結過婚 悲劇色彩比較強
王菲則是key超級高
舉手投足間也一直有一種高人一等的形象出來
連歌迷也很多都自覺高人一等
哪一個在香港人心目中比較厲害?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 96.232.82.9
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1492317905.A.CB6.html
→
04/16 12:45, , 1F
04/16 12:45, 1F
→
04/16 12:45, , 2F
04/16 12:45, 2F
推
04/16 12:45, , 3F
04/16 12:45, 3F
→
04/16 12:45, , 4F
04/16 12:45, 4F
→
04/16 12:45, , 5F
04/16 12:45, 5F
推
04/16 12:45, , 6F
04/16 12:45, 6F
→
04/16 12:46, , 7F
04/16 12:46, 7F
噓
04/16 12:46, , 8F
04/16 12:46, 8F
講實話 我覺得王菲的歌班底比較順耳 可是梅豔芳人討喜多了 而且演的電影全都很好看
王菲的電影大多都呵呵
※ 編輯: tools (96.232.82.9), 04/16/2017 12:47:17
→
04/16 12:46, , 9F
04/16 12:46, 9F
梅豔芳感覺更多贏在造型跟個人魅力營造
推
04/16 12:46, , 10F
04/16 12:46, 10F
推
04/16 12:47, , 11F
04/16 12:47, 11F
推
04/16 12:48, , 12F
04/16 12:48, 12F
推
04/16 12:48, , 13F
04/16 12:48, 13F
推
04/16 12:48, , 14F
04/16 12:48, 14F
→
04/16 12:49, , 15F
04/16 12:49, 15F
推
04/16 12:50, , 16F
04/16 12:50, 16F
你說的這應該只侷限在台灣吧?
推
04/16 12:51, , 17F
04/16 12:51, 17F
※ 編輯: tools (96.232.82.9), 04/16/2017 12:51:46
→
04/16 12:51, , 18F
04/16 12:51, 18F
※ 編輯: tools (96.232.82.9), 04/16/2017 12:52:53
→
04/16 12:52, , 19F
04/16 12:52, 19F
推
04/16 12:55, , 20F
04/16 12:55, 20F
推
04/16 12:55, , 21F
04/16 12:55, 21F
看歌路啊 你說要王菲唱出夕陽之歌啊 女人花那種歌也是不太搭
※ 編輯: tools (96.232.82.9), 04/16/2017 12:57:42
→
04/16 12:57, , 22F
04/16 12:57, 22F
推
04/16 12:59, , 23F
04/16 12:59, 23F
推
04/16 13:00, , 24F
04/16 13:00, 24F
→
04/16 13:02, , 25F
04/16 13:02, 25F
推
04/16 13:07, , 26F
04/16 13:07, 26F
幹你深得我心 我也覺得追追追很詭異
推
04/16 13:07, , 27F
04/16 13:07, 27F
推
04/16 13:07, , 28F
04/16 13:07, 28F
推
04/16 13:10, , 29F
04/16 13:10, 29F
※ 編輯: tools (96.232.82.9), 04/16/2017 13:11:33
→
04/16 13:11, , 30F
04/16 13:11, 30F
→
04/16 13:17, , 31F
04/16 13:17, 31F
→
04/16 13:18, , 32F
04/16 13:18, 32F
→
04/16 13:19, , 33F
04/16 13:19, 33F
→
04/16 13:20, , 34F
04/16 13:20, 34F
噓
04/16 13:20, , 35F
04/16 13:20, 35F
推
04/16 14:07, , 36F
04/16 14:07, 36F
推
04/16 14:28, , 37F
04/16 14:28, 37F
推
04/16 14:28, , 38F
04/16 14:28, 38F
推
04/16 14:28, , 39F
04/16 14:28, 39F
推
04/16 14:34, , 40F
04/16 14:34, 40F
推
04/16 14:34, , 41F
04/16 14:34, 41F
推
04/16 14:34, , 42F
04/16 14:34, 42F
推
04/16 14:37, , 43F
04/16 14:37, 43F
→
04/16 14:40, , 44F
04/16 14:40, 44F
推
04/16 14:50, , 45F
04/16 14:50, 45F
→
04/16 16:41, , 46F
04/16 16:41, 46F
→
04/16 16:42, , 47F
04/16 16:42, 47F
→
04/16 16:43, , 48F
04/16 16:43, 48F
→
04/16 16:44, , 49F
04/16 16:44, 49F
→
04/16 16:45, , 50F
04/16 16:45, 50F
→
04/16 16:45, , 51F
04/16 16:45, 51F
推
04/17 02:49, , 52F
04/17 02:49, 52F
→
04/17 02:50, , 53F
04/17 02:50, 53F
→
04/17 02:52, , 54F
04/17 02:52, 54F
→
04/17 02:53, , 55F
04/17 02:53, 55F
→
04/17 02:54, , 56F
04/17 02:54, 56F
→
04/17 02:55, , 57F
04/17 02:55, 57F
→
04/17 12:47, , 58F
04/17 12:47, 58F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):