[問卦] 歐洲滿滿的大平原,為何難以統一?消失
如題,中國容易統一的原因
有一派的說法來自於長江以北、太行山以南都是無險可守的平原
讓這個地方的軍閥很容易打好打滿互相兼併練蠱
出現實力足以統一全中國的大尾鱸鰻橫掃全中國
可是小弟發現歐洲從烏拉山-北德意志-庇里牛斯山也都是平原地型
照理說由於無險可守,這個地方的軍閥不是也該容易兼併整合出大勢力
進而出現能統一整個歐洲的強國嗎?
可是實際上這個地區卻從來沒有出現統一政權
反而是地型破碎的地中海地區在羅馬帝國時代出現過幾個世紀的統一政權
這讓小弟覺得很納悶
明明歐洲地形滿滿的大平原,應該比中國容易統一啊?
為何歐洲反而分裂到現在呢?
請問這是為什麼呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.161.17.83
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1487341322.A.CB4.html
→
02/17 22:22, , 1F
02/17 22:22, 1F
→
02/17 22:22, , 2F
02/17 22:22, 2F
推
02/17 22:22, , 3F
02/17 22:22, 3F
→
02/17 22:23, , 4F
02/17 22:23, 4F
→
02/17 22:23, , 5F
02/17 22:23, 5F
推
02/17 22:23, , 6F
02/17 22:23, 6F
推
02/17 22:23, , 7F
02/17 22:23, 7F
→
02/17 22:23, , 8F
02/17 22:23, 8F
→
02/17 22:23, , 9F
02/17 22:23, 9F
推
02/17 22:23, , 10F
02/17 22:23, 10F
推
02/17 22:24, , 11F
02/17 22:24, 11F
噓
02/17 22:24, , 12F
02/17 22:24, 12F
推
02/17 22:24, , 13F
02/17 22:24, 13F
→
02/17 22:24, , 14F
02/17 22:24, 14F
推
02/17 22:24, , 15F
02/17 22:24, 15F
→
02/17 22:24, , 16F
02/17 22:24, 16F
推
02/17 22:24, , 17F
02/17 22:24, 17F
查理曼帝國也有可能啊,都已經統一今天的法德意荷比盧六國
可惜不久就分裂了
→
02/17 22:24, , 18F
02/17 22:24, 18F
推
02/17 22:24, , 19F
02/17 22:24, 19F
→
02/17 22:24, , 20F
02/17 22:24, 20F
→
02/17 22:24, , 21F
02/17 22:24, 21F
→
02/17 22:25, , 22F
02/17 22:25, 22F
推
02/17 22:25, , 23F
02/17 22:25, 23F
推
02/17 22:25, , 24F
02/17 22:25, 24F
推
02/17 22:26, , 25F
02/17 22:26, 25F
→
02/17 22:26, , 26F
02/17 22:26, 26F
推
02/17 22:26, , 27F
02/17 22:26, 27F
→
02/17 22:26, , 28F
02/17 22:26, 28F
→
02/17 22:27, , 29F
02/17 22:27, 29F
→
02/17 22:27, , 30F
02/17 22:27, 30F
推
02/17 22:27, , 31F
02/17 22:27, 31F
→
02/17 22:28, , 32F
02/17 22:28, 32F
→
02/17 22:28, , 33F
02/17 22:28, 33F
推
02/17 22:28, , 34F
02/17 22:28, 34F
推
02/17 22:28, , 35F
02/17 22:28, 35F

這張不是ck2 百年戰爭劇本的地圖@@
推
02/17 22:28, , 36F
02/17 22:28, 36F
→
02/17 22:29, , 37F
02/17 22:29, 37F
還有 39 則推文
還有 2 段內文
→
02/17 22:44, , 77F
02/17 22:44, 77F
→
02/17 22:44, , 78F
02/17 22:44, 78F
看過了,作者認為歐洲地型相對中國破碎,特別是海岸線曲折,所以難以統一
可是歐陸大平原本身不就是很有利於統一的地型嗎?
中國平原面積甚至還不到歐洲的一半,而且很大一部分還是沙漠或半沙漠
所以小弟才覺得很納悶
→
02/17 22:45, , 79F
02/17 22:45, 79F
噓
02/17 22:46, , 80F
02/17 22:46, 80F
推
02/17 22:47, , 81F
02/17 22:47, 81F
※ 編輯: csi9507121 (1.161.17.83), 02/17/2017 22:51:48
推
02/17 22:49, , 82F
02/17 22:49, 82F
推
02/17 22:52, , 83F
02/17 22:52, 83F
→
02/17 22:53, , 84F
02/17 22:53, 84F
推
02/17 22:53, , 85F
02/17 22:53, 85F
→
02/17 22:53, , 86F
02/17 22:53, 86F
推
02/17 22:56, , 87F
02/17 22:56, 87F
推
02/17 22:57, , 88F
02/17 22:57, 88F
推
02/17 22:57, , 89F
02/17 22:57, 89F
噓
02/17 23:01, , 90F
02/17 23:01, 90F
推
02/17 23:02, , 91F
02/17 23:02, 91F
→
02/17 23:05, , 92F
02/17 23:05, 92F
→
02/17 23:06, , 93F
02/17 23:06, 93F
→
02/17 23:40, , 94F
02/17 23:40, 94F
→
02/17 23:44, , 95F
02/17 23:44, 95F
推
02/18 00:36, , 96F
02/18 00:36, 96F
推
02/18 00:42, , 97F
02/18 00:42, 97F
推
02/18 00:44, , 98F
02/18 00:44, 98F
推
02/18 01:11, , 99F
02/18 01:11, 99F
推
02/18 02:08, , 100F
02/18 02:08, 100F
→
02/18 02:08, , 101F
02/18 02:08, 101F
→
02/18 04:11, , 102F
02/18 04:11, 102F
推
02/18 08:29, , 103F
02/18 08:29, 103F
→
02/18 08:29, , 104F
02/18 08:29, 104F
→
02/18 08:29, , 105F
02/18 08:29, 105F
→
02/18 08:29, , 106F
02/18 08:29, 106F
→
02/18 10:33, , 107F
02/18 10:33, 107F
→
02/18 10:34, , 108F
02/18 10:34, 108F
噓
02/18 10:52, , 109F
02/18 10:52, 109F
→
02/18 10:52, , 110F
02/18 10:52, 110F
→
02/18 11:01, , 111F
02/18 11:01, 111F
推
02/18 13:55, , 112F
02/18 13:55, 112F
→
02/18 15:15, , 113F
02/18 15:15, 113F
→
02/18 15:15, , 114F
02/18 15:15, 114F
討論串 (同標題文章)