[新聞] 遊覽車安全嗎?資深駕駛爆驗車全假的消失
作者三立新聞網 | 三立新聞網 setn.com – 2017年2月15日 下午2:32
http://0rz.tw/u3gUn
社會中心/綜合報導
http://i.imgur.com/znNe5gl.jpg


13日蝶戀花旅遊公司遊覽車國道翻車,造成33死11傷,疲勞駕駛和遊覽車安全問題再度浮
上檯面。資深駕駛郭清圳昨(14)日在三立電視《54新觀點》上直言,上有政策下有對策
,不論遊覽或貨櫃車,所有驗車「都是假的」。
郭清圳指出,過去監理站驗車沒過靠錢解決了事,變成民營也是同樣的手段,就算政府以
「全程錄影」監督,但業者自有辦法應對。他舉例,跑第一趟煞車沒過,再繞一圈機器動
個手腳就算過關了,車燈沒亮,業者直接拿LED燈裝,只要燈有亮,錄影也看不出來,業
者還會提醒要歸還,「後面還有很多台要用」。
「驗車,假的。」郭清圳表示,不只遊覽車驗車有紕漏,貨櫃車更直接用AB車「貍貓換太
子」。他解釋,一台貨櫃車有許多零件、板架,但每樣東西驗的日期不同,若是要認真一
個一個驗連生意都不用做了,許多業者會用同一台車去檢驗,把型號磨掉再打上其他台車
的型號,怎麼驗其實都是同一台車。
...
當監理所查核督導的公務員是棒槌?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 39.10.193.21
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1487206455.A.7F8.html
→
02/16 08:54, , 1F
02/16 08:54, 1F
推
02/16 08:55, , 2F
02/16 08:55, 2F
那業者打點要花多少?
※ 編輯: L046 (39.10.193.21), 02/16/2017 08:55:50
→
02/16 08:55, , 3F
02/16 08:55, 3F
→
02/16 08:55, , 4F
02/16 08:55, 4F
推
02/16 08:55, , 5F
02/16 08:55, 5F
推
02/16 08:55, , 6F
02/16 08:55, 6F
→
02/16 08:55, , 7F
02/16 08:55, 7F
推
02/16 08:55, , 8F
02/16 08:55, 8F
→
02/16 08:55, , 9F
02/16 08:55, 9F
推
02/16 08:55, , 10F
02/16 08:55, 10F
→
02/16 08:55, , 11F
02/16 08:55, 11F
→
02/16 08:56, , 12F
02/16 08:56, 12F
→
02/16 08:56, , 13F
02/16 08:56, 13F
→
02/16 08:56, , 14F
02/16 08:56, 14F
噓
02/16 08:57, , 15F
02/16 08:57, 15F
→
02/16 08:57, , 16F
02/16 08:57, 16F
推
02/16 08:58, , 17F
02/16 08:58, 17F
推
02/16 08:58, , 18F
02/16 08:58, 18F
噓
02/16 08:58, , 19F
02/16 08:58, 19F
→
02/16 08:58, , 20F
02/16 08:58, 20F
→
02/16 08:58, , 21F
02/16 08:58, 21F
→
02/16 09:00, , 22F
02/16 09:00, 22F
噓
02/16 09:00, , 23F
02/16 09:00, 23F
→
02/16 09:01, , 24F
02/16 09:01, 24F
推
02/16 09:01, , 25F
02/16 09:01, 25F
→
02/16 09:01, , 26F
02/16 09:01, 26F
→
02/16 09:02, , 27F
02/16 09:02, 27F
推
02/16 09:02, , 28F
02/16 09:02, 28F
噓
02/16 09:02, , 29F
02/16 09:02, 29F
噓
02/16 09:02, , 30F
02/16 09:02, 30F
→
02/16 09:03, , 31F
02/16 09:03, 31F
噓
02/16 09:03, , 32F
02/16 09:03, 32F
→
02/16 09:03, , 33F
02/16 09:03, 33F
→
02/16 09:03, , 34F
02/16 09:03, 34F
→
02/16 09:04, , 35F
02/16 09:04, 35F
推
02/16 09:05, , 36F
02/16 09:05, 36F
→
02/16 09:05, , 37F
02/16 09:05, 37F
噓
02/16 09:06, , 38F
02/16 09:06, 38F
推
02/16 09:07, , 39F
02/16 09:07, 39F
→
02/16 09:07, , 40F
02/16 09:07, 40F
推
02/16 09:07, , 41F
02/16 09:07, 41F
→
02/16 09:07, , 42F
02/16 09:07, 42F
→
02/16 09:09, , 43F
02/16 09:09, 43F
推
02/16 09:10, , 44F
02/16 09:10, 44F
→
02/16 09:13, , 45F
02/16 09:13, 45F
→
02/16 09:13, , 46F
02/16 09:13, 46F
推
02/16 09:16, , 47F
02/16 09:16, 47F
→
02/16 09:20, , 48F
02/16 09:20, 48F
推
02/16 09:21, , 49F
02/16 09:21, 49F
推
02/16 09:22, , 50F
02/16 09:22, 50F
→
02/16 09:22, , 51F
02/16 09:22, 51F
推
02/16 09:24, , 52F
02/16 09:24, 52F
→
02/16 09:27, , 53F
02/16 09:27, 53F
推
02/16 09:27, , 54F
02/16 09:27, 54F
推
02/16 09:28, , 55F
02/16 09:28, 55F
推
02/16 09:29, , 56F
02/16 09:29, 56F
推
02/16 09:29, , 57F
02/16 09:29, 57F
→
02/16 09:33, , 58F
02/16 09:33, 58F
推
02/16 09:40, , 59F
02/16 09:40, 59F
→
02/16 09:42, , 60F
02/16 09:42, 60F
→
02/16 09:52, , 61F
02/16 09:52, 61F
→
02/16 09:52, , 62F
02/16 09:52, 62F
噓
02/16 09:55, , 63F
02/16 09:55, 63F
→
02/16 09:56, , 64F
02/16 09:56, 64F
推
02/16 10:06, , 65F
02/16 10:06, 65F
噓
02/16 10:18, , 66F
02/16 10:18, 66F
推
02/16 11:48, , 67F
02/16 11:48, 67F
→
02/16 12:27, , 68F
02/16 12:27, 68F
→
02/16 12:28, , 69F
02/16 12:28, 69F
推
02/16 12:55, , 70F
02/16 12:55, 70F
推
02/16 13:15, , 71F
02/16 13:15, 71F
推
02/16 13:29, , 72F
02/16 13:29, 72F
推
02/16 14:00, , 73F
02/16 14:00, 73F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):