[新聞] 台日港韓比一比 台男最溫柔!消失
台日港韓比一比 台男最溫柔!
2017/02/13 21:03 陳詩雅 陳知學 報導
日本網友最近針對台日港韓4地男性進行評比,排列出最好和最差的部分,結果台灣男性
在打扮和所得都拿最後一名,但是性格部分則是奪冠,真的是這樣嗎?引發網友熱議。
覺得台灣的男生大致上都不太注重外型,真的是這樣嗎,日本網友針對台日港韓男性,進
行評比,認為最會打扮的是日本男性,最不會打扮的則是台灣男生,而所得也是台灣男生
賺最少,不過性格則是台男奪冠,不過台灣男生穿著真的有這麼差嗎,日本女生受不了男
友穿得醜,但台灣女生似乎看慣了,也不覺得醜了,但對於台灣男生是否賺得比較少。
攤開104年薪資調查來看,台灣平均月薪46781元,韓國107521元,日本更高達114508元,
都是台灣的兩倍以上啊,但男生有話說,台灣男性雖然被認為較不會打扮所得較少但是,
貼心會幫女生提包包,溫柔不拘小節,看來靠溫柔體貼取勝,還是能在亞洲女生心中發光
發熱。
【更多新聞詳情請上 - 華視新聞網 】
http://news.cts.com.tw/cts/life/201702/201702131851057.html#.WKPq93_IqcY
--
賺P幣,為家計
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 211.21.120.43
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1487138009.A.A40.html
推
02/15 13:54, , 1F
02/15 13:54, 1F
→
02/15 13:54, , 2F
02/15 13:54, 2F
→
02/15 13:54, , 3F
02/15 13:54, 3F
→
02/15 13:54, , 4F
02/15 13:54, 4F
推
02/15 13:54, , 5F
02/15 13:54, 5F
推
02/15 13:55, , 6F
02/15 13:55, 6F
→
02/15 13:55, , 7F
02/15 13:55, 7F
推
02/15 13:55, , 8F
02/15 13:55, 8F
推
02/15 13:55, , 9F
02/15 13:55, 9F
推
02/15 13:55, , 10F
02/15 13:55, 10F
噓
02/15 13:55, , 11F
02/15 13:55, 11F
推
02/15 13:55, , 12F
02/15 13:55, 12F
噓
02/15 13:56, , 13F
02/15 13:56, 13F
→
02/15 13:56, , 14F
02/15 13:56, 14F
→
02/15 13:58, , 15F
02/15 13:58, 15F
推
02/15 13:58, , 16F
02/15 13:58, 16F
推
02/15 13:58, , 17F
02/15 13:58, 17F
推
02/15 13:58, , 18F
02/15 13:58, 18F
推
02/15 14:03, , 19F
02/15 14:03, 19F
→
02/15 14:03, , 20F
02/15 14:03, 20F
推
02/15 14:06, , 21F
02/15 14:06, 21F
→
02/15 14:07, , 22F
02/15 14:07, 22F
推
02/15 14:07, , 23F
02/15 14:07, 23F
→
02/15 14:07, , 24F
02/15 14:07, 24F
→
02/15 14:08, , 25F
02/15 14:08, 25F
噓
02/15 14:08, , 26F
02/15 14:08, 26F
推
02/15 14:08, , 27F
02/15 14:08, 27F
→
02/15 14:09, , 28F
02/15 14:09, 28F
推
02/15 14:09, , 29F
02/15 14:09, 29F
推
02/15 14:10, , 30F
02/15 14:10, 30F
推
02/15 14:10, , 31F
02/15 14:10, 31F
→
02/15 14:12, , 32F
02/15 14:12, 32F
推
02/15 14:14, , 33F
02/15 14:14, 33F
推
02/15 14:15, , 34F
02/15 14:15, 34F
推
02/15 14:16, , 35F
02/15 14:16, 35F
推
02/15 14:16, , 36F
02/15 14:16, 36F
→
02/15 14:16, , 37F
02/15 14:16, 37F
推
02/15 14:17, , 38F
02/15 14:17, 38F
推
02/15 14:18, , 39F
02/15 14:18, 39F
→
02/15 14:18, , 40F
02/15 14:18, 40F
推
02/15 14:20, , 41F
02/15 14:20, 41F
噓
02/15 14:20, , 42F
02/15 14:20, 42F
推
02/15 14:22, , 43F
02/15 14:22, 43F
→
02/15 14:22, , 44F
02/15 14:22, 44F
→
02/15 14:22, , 45F
02/15 14:22, 45F
推
02/15 14:22, , 46F
02/15 14:22, 46F
→
02/15 14:22, , 47F
02/15 14:22, 47F
→
02/15 14:23, , 48F
02/15 14:23, 48F
噓
02/15 14:23, , 49F
02/15 14:23, 49F
→
02/15 14:24, , 50F
02/15 14:24, 50F
→
02/15 14:24, , 51F
02/15 14:24, 51F
推
02/15 14:26, , 52F
02/15 14:26, 52F
→
02/15 14:27, , 53F
02/15 14:27, 53F
推
02/15 14:29, , 54F
02/15 14:29, 54F
推
02/15 14:29, , 55F
02/15 14:29, 55F
推
02/15 14:29, , 56F
02/15 14:29, 56F
→
02/15 14:31, , 57F
02/15 14:31, 57F
→
02/15 14:31, , 58F
02/15 14:31, 58F
推
02/15 14:35, , 59F
02/15 14:35, 59F
推
02/15 14:40, , 60F
02/15 14:40, 60F
→
02/15 14:40, , 61F
02/15 14:40, 61F
推
02/15 14:42, , 62F
02/15 14:42, 62F
推
02/15 14:45, , 63F
02/15 14:45, 63F
推
02/15 14:46, , 64F
02/15 14:46, 64F
→
02/15 14:48, , 65F
02/15 14:48, 65F
推
02/15 14:48, , 66F
02/15 14:48, 66F
推
02/15 14:49, , 67F
02/15 14:49, 67F
推
02/15 14:57, , 68F
02/15 14:57, 68F
噓
02/15 15:01, , 69F
02/15 15:01, 69F
推
02/15 15:20, , 70F
02/15 15:20, 70F
推
02/15 15:23, , 71F
02/15 15:23, 71F
噓
02/15 15:25, , 72F
02/15 15:25, 72F
噓
02/15 15:29, , 73F
02/15 15:29, 73F
推
02/15 15:30, , 74F
02/15 15:30, 74F
噓
02/15 15:32, , 75F
02/15 15:32, 75F
噓
02/15 16:01, , 76F
02/15 16:01, 76F
噓
02/15 16:07, , 77F
02/15 16:07, 77F
推
02/15 16:51, , 78F
02/15 16:51, 78F
推
02/15 17:31, , 79F
02/15 17:31, 79F
→
02/15 17:42, , 80F
02/15 17:42, 80F
推
02/15 19:36, , 81F
02/15 19:36, 81F
推
02/16 18:15, , 82F
02/16 18:15, 82F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):