Re: [問卦] 甲甲在學校教育這點上是不是大獲全勝了消失
推
02/14 21:23,
02/14 21:23
推
02/14 21:26,
02/14 21:26
推
02/14 21:37,
02/14 21:37
推
02/14 21:44,
02/14 21:44
推
02/14 22:26,
02/14 22:26
噓
02/15 00:01,
02/15 00:01
→
02/15 01:02,
02/15 01:02
推
02/15 09:36,
02/15 09:36
推
02/15 11:18,
02/15 11:18
我國小健康與教育老師花了三堂(週)課時間在講男女生生殖系統,
當有同學在那裡訕笑時,老師很嚴肅的說這是很重要的議題,
在現在那些說同志教育就等於性解放的人眼裡,
這樣不就更誇張???國小六年級欸,教探索身體,
那時是民國86年,笑死人,怎麼不看你們有出來抗議過。
你要說同志教育不給家長參觀?
同志諮詢熱線去校園演講我想很歡迎家長參加,
什麼,你要說熱線是約炮單位,好啊,
反正現在校園就是家長最大,
我就不信你們這些家長提案說相關課程提到相關議題要旁聽,
老師會拒絕,
更別提你們這些口口聲聲說關心小孩的到底會不會撥空去,
然後或者是去現場之後在那裡嚷嚷說啊老師都騙人啦~,
講難聽點啦,
你們要反對還想不到理由反對嗎?
之前TLC那個喬艾爾約炮騙錢怎麼不見你們出來抗議說妨礙孩子權益,
你知道有多少女性同胞被騙了多少錢,還因為不想戴套所以叫女生吃避孕藥,
怎麼不見你們出來靠腰說這樣怎麼教小孩?
從以前的課本就在那裡教大家要尊重不同思想(棋盤與綠豆糕),
你看看你在做什麼?
我尊重你有不同思想,但是講那些超越大家知識的話,
倒果為因,就不要出來讓海外聽眾都嚇呆了。
那已經是在造謠了。
--
They annoy me those who employ me
They could destroy me, they should enjoy me
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 124.149.157.35
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1487132955.A.08B.html
推
02/15 12:31, , 1F
02/15 12:31, 1F
推
02/15 12:51, , 2F
02/15 12:51, 2F
噓
02/15 14:13, , 3F
02/15 14:13, 3F
→
02/15 14:15, , 4F
02/15 14:15, 4F
→
02/15 14:15, , 5F
02/15 14:15, 5F
我實在不知道你哪裡有聽說上課有講煙屌大熟男,
或者你可以提供資訊讓大家聞香一下,
另外,基本邏輯問題:
討論這個議題就等於一定要支持這個議題嗎?
再者:
頂端淫趴玩法
這是同性戀惹出來的新聞嗎?
少在那裡把焦點模糊了,
性愛毒品不單只是同性戀的共業。
還有,聽說那個喬艾爾也有吸食毒品,針對這一part還有欠錢叫女生吃避孕藥這些事,
怎麼不看你義憤填膺?
噓
02/15 14:51, , 6F
02/15 14:51, 6F
→
02/15 14:52, , 7F
02/15 14:52, 7F
→
02/15 14:52, , 8F
02/15 14:52, 8F
基本邏輯問題:討論這個議題就等於一定要支持這個議題嗎?
也有口交姐在街頭上公然吃法國麵包,你怎麼不說她也支持公然性交?
愛滋是小感冒是安慰患者的話,從沒有一個團體用這樣的話倡導愛滋議題。
規律接受治療其生活餘命(life expectancy)與疾病傳染力都會大幅降低,
然後星爍你確定要出來討打臉嗎?
從2013年八卦、西哲被打得啪啪作響還不夠?
※ 編輯: machinly (124.149.157.35), 02/15/2017 15:04:23
噓
02/15 15:09, , 9F
02/15 15:09, 9F
→
02/15 15:10, , 10F
02/15 15:10, 10F
→
02/15 15:11, , 11F
02/15 15:11, 11F
→
02/15 15:11, , 12F
02/15 15:11, 12F
我不知道你要說哪一part,但我就客觀現實跟你說,
近些年開始倡導hiv+ underdectable,規律服藥與生活餘命已經有一堆研究在做,
May, M. T., Gompels, M., Delpech, V., Porter, K., Orkin, C., Kegg,
S., ... & Chadwick, D. (2014). Impact on life expectancy of HIV-1
positive individuals of CD4+ cell count and viral load response to
antiretroviral therapy.Aids,28(8), 1193-1202.
Patients who started ART with a low CD4+ cell count significantly
improve their life expectancy if they have a good CD4+ cell count
response and undetectable viral load.
Deeks, S. G., Lewin, S. R., & Havlir, D. V. (2013). The end of
AIDS: HIV infection as a chronic disease. The Lancet, 382(9903),
1525-1533.
For patients who are motivated to take therapy and who have access
to lifelong treatment, AIDS-related illnesses are no longer the
primary threat, but a new set of HIV-associated complications have
emerged, resulting in a novel chronic disease that for many will
span several decades of life.
google scholar丟幾個關鍵字 hiv underdectable life expectancy
當客觀研究都一一證實這件事為真,你還在那裡堅持你相信的:
The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.
※ 編輯: machinly (124.149.157.35), 02/15/2017 15:22:03
推
02/15 15:18, , 13F
02/15 15:18, 13F
噓
02/15 15:24, , 14F
02/15 15:24, 14F
讓我整理我們之間這段對話:
你先提愛滋等於小感冒是超越常識的宣言,
我跟你說沒有愛滋防治單位用這個口號來倡議愛滋議題,
現在國際趨勢是愛滋規律接受治療後生活餘命可以延長,
甚至與一般人無異,
然後你跟我說我不願面對現實,
我找出現實研究給你,
事實上,你們連事前投藥都可以污名化,
你們知道國際現在倡議愛滋議題是:
By 2020, 90% of all people with diagnosed HIV infection will
receive sustained antiretroviral therapy. By 2020, 90% of all
people receiving antiretroviral therapy will have viral
suppression.
Ref.: UnAIDS https://goo.gl/DmaFDu
然後:
Research has also shown that fear of stigma and discrimination,
which can also be linked to fear of violence, discourages people
living with HIV from disclosing their status even to family
members and sexual partners and undermines their ability and
willingness to access and adhere to treatment. Thus, stigma and
discrimination weaken the ability of individuals and communities
to protect themselves from HIV and to stay healthy if they are
living with HIV.
Ref.: UnAIDS https://goo.gl/uSvUhf
歧視與偏見是重要課題之一。
※ 編輯: machinly (124.149.157.35), 02/15/2017 15:36:38
→
02/15 15:26, , 15F
02/15 15:26, 15F
→
02/15 15:27, , 16F
02/15 15:27, 16F
→
02/15 15:28, , 17F
02/15 15:28, 17F
→
02/15 15:28, , 18F
02/15 15:28, 18F
噓
02/15 15:32, , 19F
02/15 15:32, 19F
→
02/15 15:33, , 20F
02/15 15:33, 20F
→
02/15 15:33, , 21F
02/15 15:33, 21F
推
02/15 15:35, , 22F
02/15 15:35, 22F
→
02/15 15:36, , 23F
02/15 15:36, 23F
※ 編輯: machinly (124.149.157.35), 02/15/2017 15:39:13
→
02/15 15:37, , 24F
02/15 15:37, 24F
→
02/15 15:38, , 25F
02/15 15:38, 25F
還有 31 則推文
推
02/15 16:02, , 57F
02/15 16:02, 57F
→
02/15 16:03, , 58F
02/15 16:03, 58F
推
02/15 16:53, , 59F
02/15 16:53, 59F
推
02/15 16:55, , 60F
02/15 16:55, 60F
→
02/15 17:05, , 61F
02/15 17:05, 61F
推
02/15 17:06, , 62F
02/15 17:06, 62F
推
02/15 17:07, , 63F
02/15 17:07, 63F
推
02/15 17:08, , 64F
02/15 17:08, 64F
→
02/15 17:09, , 65F
02/15 17:09, 65F
→
02/15 17:12, , 66F
02/15 17:12, 66F
→
02/15 17:15, , 67F
02/15 17:15, 67F
→
02/15 17:17, , 68F
02/15 17:17, 68F
→
02/15 17:17, , 69F
02/15 17:17, 69F
推
02/15 17:17, , 70F
02/15 17:17, 70F
→
02/15 17:18, , 71F
02/15 17:18, 71F
→
02/15 17:18, , 72F
02/15 17:18, 72F
→
02/15 17:19, , 73F
02/15 17:19, 73F
→
02/15 17:19, , 74F
02/15 17:19, 74F
→
02/15 17:20, , 75F
02/15 17:20, 75F
→
02/15 17:21, , 76F
02/15 17:21, 76F
→
02/15 17:21, , 77F
02/15 17:21, 77F
→
02/15 17:21, , 78F
02/15 17:21, 78F
→
02/15 17:22, , 79F
02/15 17:22, 79F
→
02/15 17:22, , 80F
02/15 17:22, 80F
→
02/15 17:23, , 81F
02/15 17:23, 81F
→
02/15 17:24, , 82F
02/15 17:24, 82F
推
02/15 17:26, , 83F
02/15 17:26, 83F
→
02/15 17:26, , 84F
02/15 17:26, 84F
→
02/15 17:26, , 85F
02/15 17:26, 85F
→
02/15 17:27, , 86F
02/15 17:27, 86F
噓
02/15 17:50, , 87F
02/15 17:50, 87F
→
02/15 17:52, , 88F
02/15 17:52, 88F
→
02/15 17:52, , 89F
02/15 17:52, 89F
噓
02/15 17:57, , 90F
02/15 17:57, 90F
推
02/15 18:14, , 91F
02/15 18:14, 91F
噓
02/15 18:22, , 92F
02/15 18:22, 92F
噓
02/15 18:24, , 93F
02/15 18:24, 93F
推
02/15 20:55, , 94F
02/15 20:55, 94F
→
02/15 20:56, , 95F
02/15 20:56, 95F
→
02/15 20:56, , 96F
02/15 20:56, 96F
討論串 (同標題文章)