[新聞] 立委:業主陳情 勞檢開罰不符比例消失
1.媒體來源:
聯合新聞網
2.完整新聞標題:
立委:業主陳情 勞檢開罰不符比例
3.完整新聞內文:
勞檢暴增惹民怨,國民黨立委陳宜民表示,昨天高雄幼兒園業者集體向他陳情,高雄市勞
工局勞檢時態度強硬,開罰沒有比例原則,也不給緩衝期,不近人情。
陳宜民說,昨天有園長表示,可能是檔案沒有計算正確,勞檢時被查出少發給一名員工
300多元加班費,被開罰一張4萬多元的罰單。
陳宜民說,另一名幼兒園負責人說,一名員工薪資算錯,少發了15元,被罰2萬元。
他表示,陳情的案例都只是初犯,高雄市勞工局態度強硬,開罰最高倍數罰單,相較於其
他部會取締,勞檢不合情理,不符合比例原則。
陳宜民表示,像是加班費計算方式,直接以1.34跟1.67的倍數計算等細節,不是所有中小
企業都能請一個這麼專業的會計來算,小數點算錯,卻被開這麼重的罰單,會產生很大民
怨。
陳宜民表示,高雄市許多勞檢人力,是約聘雇人員,不具勞檢資格,只是把資料帶回,讓
有資格的人開罰單。
國民黨立委李彥秀說,勞動部要捍衛勞工權益,但沒有足夠時間宣導,第一時間就開罰,
容易引起反彈,勞資要有足夠教育宣導,裁罰比例也要有準則,不能僅靠查察人員的主觀
意見。
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
https://goo.gl/yjTSne
5.備註:
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.240.150.201
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1479562954.A.F2C.html
推
11/19 21:43, , 1F
11/19 21:43, 1F
推
11/19 21:43, , 2F
11/19 21:43, 2F
噓
11/19 21:43, , 3F
11/19 21:43, 3F
→
11/19 21:43, , 4F
11/19 21:43, 4F
推
11/19 21:43, , 5F
11/19 21:43, 5F
→
11/19 21:44, , 6F
11/19 21:44, 6F
→
11/19 21:44, , 7F
11/19 21:44, 7F
→
11/19 21:44, , 8F
11/19 21:44, 8F
噓
11/19 21:44, , 9F
11/19 21:44, 9F
→
11/19 21:44, , 10F
11/19 21:44, 10F
推
11/19 21:44, , 11F
11/19 21:44, 11F
推
11/19 21:44, , 12F
11/19 21:44, 12F
推
11/19 21:45, , 13F
11/19 21:45, 13F
→
11/19 21:45, , 14F
11/19 21:45, 14F
→
11/19 21:45, , 15F
11/19 21:45, 15F
推
11/19 21:45, , 16F
11/19 21:45, 16F
推
11/19 21:45, , 17F
11/19 21:45, 17F
推
11/19 21:45, , 18F
11/19 21:45, 18F
→
11/19 21:45, , 19F
11/19 21:45, 19F
噓
11/19 21:46, , 20F
11/19 21:46, 20F
噓
11/19 21:46, , 21F
11/19 21:46, 21F
噓
11/19 21:46, , 22F
11/19 21:46, 22F
→
11/19 21:46, , 23F
11/19 21:46, 23F
→
11/19 21:46, , 24F
11/19 21:46, 24F
推
11/19 21:46, , 25F
11/19 21:46, 25F
→
11/19 21:46, , 26F
11/19 21:46, 26F
→
11/19 21:46, , 27F
11/19 21:46, 27F
噓
11/19 21:47, , 28F
11/19 21:47, 28F
→
11/19 21:47, , 29F
11/19 21:47, 29F
→
11/19 21:48, , 30F
11/19 21:48, 30F
噓
11/19 21:48, , 31F
11/19 21:48, 31F
推
11/19 21:49, , 32F
11/19 21:49, 32F
→
11/19 21:50, , 33F
11/19 21:50, 33F
→
11/19 21:50, , 34F
11/19 21:50, 34F
→
11/19 21:51, , 35F
11/19 21:51, 35F
→
11/19 21:52, , 36F
11/19 21:52, 36F
推
11/19 21:53, , 37F
11/19 21:53, 37F
噓
11/19 21:54, , 38F
11/19 21:54, 38F
噓
11/19 21:55, , 39F
11/19 21:55, 39F
還有 26 則推文
→
11/19 22:26, , 66F
11/19 22:26, 66F
→
11/19 22:27, , 67F
11/19 22:27, 67F
→
11/19 22:27, , 68F
11/19 22:27, 68F
噓
11/19 22:31, , 69F
11/19 22:31, 69F
推
11/19 22:32, , 70F
11/19 22:32, 70F
噓
11/19 22:34, , 71F
11/19 22:34, 71F
噓
11/19 22:40, , 72F
11/19 22:40, 72F
噓
11/19 22:53, , 73F
11/19 22:53, 73F
推
11/19 23:09, , 74F
11/19 23:09, 74F
噓
11/19 23:14, , 75F
11/19 23:14, 75F
噓
11/19 23:34, , 76F
11/19 23:34, 76F
噓
11/19 23:38, , 77F
11/19 23:38, 77F
噓
11/19 23:38, , 78F
11/19 23:38, 78F
→
11/19 23:41, , 79F
11/19 23:41, 79F
噓
11/19 23:43, , 80F
11/19 23:43, 80F
→
11/19 23:43, , 81F
11/19 23:43, 81F
推
11/19 23:48, , 82F
11/19 23:48, 82F
推
11/19 23:50, , 83F
11/19 23:50, 83F
→
11/19 23:51, , 84F
11/19 23:51, 84F
噓
11/20 00:25, , 85F
11/20 00:25, 85F
推
11/20 00:26, , 86F
11/20 00:26, 86F
→
11/20 00:28, , 87F
11/20 00:28, 87F
推
11/20 00:29, , 88F
11/20 00:29, 88F
→
11/20 00:30, , 89F
11/20 00:30, 89F
推
11/20 00:40, , 90F
11/20 00:40, 90F
噓
11/20 00:46, , 91F
11/20 00:46, 91F
噓
11/20 01:07, , 92F
11/20 01:07, 92F
噓
11/20 01:19, , 93F
11/20 01:19, 93F
噓
11/20 02:15, , 94F
11/20 02:15, 94F
→
11/20 02:29, , 95F
11/20 02:29, 95F
噓
11/20 03:04, , 96F
11/20 03:04, 96F
推
11/20 03:13, , 97F
11/20 03:13, 97F
噓
11/20 03:27, , 98F
11/20 03:27, 98F
噓
11/20 03:30, , 99F
11/20 03:30, 99F
噓
11/20 03:43, , 100F
11/20 03:43, 100F
噓
11/20 07:30, , 101F
11/20 07:30, 101F
→
11/20 07:30, , 102F
11/20 07:30, 102F
推
11/20 10:08, , 103F
11/20 10:08, 103F
→
11/20 11:22, , 104F
11/20 11:22, 104F
→
11/20 11:25, , 105F
11/20 11:25, 105F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 7 篇):