Re: [新聞] 中藥行這項服務消失?從業者抗議消失
原文恕刪
小弟家裡剛好中藥行
為什麼會反彈這麼大?
原因在於中醫師的調劑權要讓渡給藥商,雖然兩者都具有調劑權的權限,但身為下游的中
藥行相當於被勒緊脖子,接收到的 藥材的好壞皆在中游的良心。
相當於西醫的醫師跟合作藥商都具有開藥的權利,民眾可以直接向藥商拿藥即可 ,無需
透過醫行。
這樣會造就什麼問題?
認證系統不完整的情況下,藥行只能開處方簽給藥商去出藥,但藥行真正能賺錢的地方卻
是這些配方,因為大部分藥行並不像西醫行是有健保體制,可以從這邊去拿錢。在配方外
流和民眾認知下,會漸漸往藥商靠攏,不管什麼疾病就往藥商奔,因為藥商已經有配方了
,但有些症狀並非食藥就可以痊癒的,在這潮流下 ,中藥行徹底沒落,傳統拔罐,針灸
,把脈 ,望氣的傳承會斷絕。
徹底看透資進黨作風…
不管是電業法,農產委員會,還是最近一堆牽扯民生的法案都是想掌握民生 ,有點對不
起智力測驗啊!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.139.113.226
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1478660344.A.B5A.html
推
11/09 10:59, , 1F
11/09 10:59, 1F
推
11/09 11:00, , 2F
11/09 11:00, 2F
噓
11/09 11:00, , 3F
11/09 11:00, 3F
中藥行是醫師兼藥師…分不開的
→
11/09 11:00, , 4F
11/09 11:00, 4F
認證系統問題,並不是中藥行問題
→
11/09 11:01, , 5F
11/09 11:01, 5F
推
11/09 11:01, , 6F
11/09 11:01, 6F
以後養生藥包和湯類都只能跟藥商叫唷
※ 編輯: justwater (223.139.113.226), 11/09/2016 11:04:09
推
11/09 11:02, , 7F
11/09 11:02, 7F
推
11/09 11:03, , 8F
11/09 11:03, 8F
→
11/09 11:03, , 9F
11/09 11:03, 9F
推
11/09 11:03, , 10F
11/09 11:03, 10F
推
11/09 11:03, , 11F
11/09 11:03, 11F
→
11/09 11:03, , 12F
11/09 11:03, 12F
→
11/09 11:03, , 13F
11/09 11:03, 13F
有唷,不加入不給批的
→
11/09 11:04, , 14F
11/09 11:04, 14F
→
11/09 11:04, , 15F
11/09 11:04, 15F
贊成開放!可是政府只給技術士還限制很多
→
11/09 11:04, , 16F
11/09 11:04, 16F
噓
11/09 11:04, , 17F
11/09 11:04, 17F
→
11/09 11:05, , 18F
11/09 11:05, 18F
※ 編輯: justwater (223.139.113.226), 11/09/2016 11:07:09
噓
11/09 11:06, , 19F
11/09 11:06, 19F
→
11/09 11:06, , 20F
11/09 11:06, 20F
噓
11/09 11:06, , 21F
11/09 11:06, 21F
→
11/09 11:06, , 22F
11/09 11:06, 22F
→
11/09 11:07, , 23F
11/09 11:07, 23F
→
11/09 11:07, , 24F
11/09 11:07, 24F
→
11/09 11:07, , 25F
11/09 11:07, 25F
我們家只有抓藥!但把脈還是要做,怕藥開重了傷身
※ 編輯: justwater (223.139.113.226), 11/09/2016 11:09:23
→
11/09 11:08, , 26F
11/09 11:08, 26F
→
11/09 11:09, , 27F
11/09 11:09, 27F
噓
11/09 11:09, , 28F
11/09 11:09, 28F
噓
11/09 11:09, , 29F
11/09 11:09, 29F
→
11/09 11:09, , 30F
11/09 11:09, 30F
→
11/09 11:09, , 31F
11/09 11:09, 31F
→
11/09 11:10, , 32F
11/09 11:10, 32F
→
11/09 11:10, , 33F
11/09 11:10, 33F
→
11/09 11:10, , 34F
11/09 11:10, 34F
→
11/09 11:10, , 35F
11/09 11:10, 35F
→
11/09 11:11, , 36F
11/09 11:11, 36F
→
11/09 11:11, , 37F
11/09 11:11, 37F
噓
11/09 11:13, , 38F
11/09 11:13, 38F
→
11/09 11:13, , 39F
11/09 11:13, 39F
→
11/09 11:14, , 40F
11/09 11:14, 40F
→
11/09 11:14, , 41F
11/09 11:14, 41F
真的…給個完整考試制度,也是不會如此多怨言
※ 編輯: justwater (223.139.113.226), 11/09/2016 11:16:25
→
11/09 11:16, , 42F
11/09 11:16, 42F
→
11/09 11:16, , 43F
11/09 11:16, 43F
→
11/09 11:26, , 44F
11/09 11:26, 44F
→
11/09 11:26, , 45F
11/09 11:26, 45F
→
11/09 11:27, , 46F
11/09 11:27, 46F
→
11/09 11:27, , 47F
11/09 11:27, 47F
→
11/09 11:32, , 48F
11/09 11:32, 48F
→
11/09 11:38, , 49F
11/09 11:38, 49F
→
11/09 11:38, , 50F
11/09 11:38, 50F
→
11/09 11:38, , 51F
11/09 11:38, 51F
→
11/09 11:38, , 52F
11/09 11:38, 52F
→
11/09 11:38, , 53F
11/09 11:38, 53F
→
11/09 11:38, , 54F
11/09 11:38, 54F
→
11/09 11:39, , 55F
11/09 11:39, 55F
→
11/09 11:41, , 56F
11/09 11:41, 56F
→
11/09 11:41, , 57F
11/09 11:41, 57F
→
11/09 11:41, , 58F
11/09 11:41, 58F
→
11/09 11:42, , 59F
11/09 11:42, 59F
→
11/09 11:46, , 60F
11/09 11:46, 60F
→
11/09 11:46, , 61F
11/09 11:46, 61F
→
11/09 11:53, , 62F
11/09 11:53, 62F
→
11/09 11:53, , 63F
11/09 11:53, 63F
→
11/09 11:53, , 64F
11/09 11:53, 64F
→
11/09 11:53, , 65F
11/09 11:53, 65F
→
11/09 11:53, , 66F
11/09 11:53, 66F
→
11/09 11:54, , 67F
11/09 11:54, 67F
噓
11/09 11:59, , 68F
11/09 11:59, 68F
→
11/09 21:39, , 69F
11/09 21:39, 69F
推
11/09 23:28, , 70F
11/09 23:28, 70F
→
11/09 23:28, , 71F
11/09 23:28, 71F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 8 篇):