[問卦] 為什麼任天堂主機性能永遠落後一個世代?消失
雖然任天堂一直以所謂的遊戲性撐起整間公司
但它這三十年來所有主機的性能未免也太過落後了吧
以性能來說
PS1 > SS > N64
PS2 = XBOX > DC > NGC
PS3 > XBOX360 > Wii (=PS2)
PS4 > X1 > WiiU (<PS3)
PSP > NDS
PSV > 3DS
現在任社又出了那個什麼家機掌機合一的Switch
以家用機來說性能絕對遠不及將來的PS5或X2
以掌機來說也絕對遠不及將來發行的PSV2
所以我懇請任天堂快點轉型為軟件公司
別再製造電子垃圾吧
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 60.246.217.162
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1477133477.A.2D1.html
推
10/22 18:52, , 1F
10/22 18:52, 1F
推
10/22 18:52, , 2F
10/22 18:52, 2F
→
10/22 18:52, , 3F
10/22 18:52, 3F
→
10/22 18:53, , 4F
10/22 18:53, 4F
→
10/22 18:53, , 5F
10/22 18:53, 5F
→
10/22 18:53, , 6F
10/22 18:53, 6F
→
10/22 18:53, , 7F
10/22 18:53, 7F
→
10/22 18:54, , 8F
10/22 18:54, 8F
推
10/22 18:54, , 9F
10/22 18:54, 9F
→
10/22 18:54, , 10F
10/22 18:54, 10F
→
10/22 18:55, , 11F
10/22 18:55, 11F
噓
10/22 18:55, , 12F
10/22 18:55, 12F
推
10/22 18:56, , 13F
10/22 18:56, 13F
噓
10/22 18:56, , 14F
10/22 18:56, 14F
→
10/22 18:56, , 15F
10/22 18:56, 15F
→
10/22 18:56, , 16F
10/22 18:56, 16F
→
10/22 18:57, , 17F
10/22 18:57, 17F
推
10/22 18:57, , 18F
10/22 18:57, 18F
→
10/22 18:58, , 19F
10/22 18:58, 19F
噓
10/22 18:58, , 20F
10/22 18:58, 20F
推
10/22 18:58, , 21F
10/22 18:58, 21F
推
10/22 18:59, , 22F
10/22 18:59, 22F
推
10/22 18:59, , 23F
10/22 18:59, 23F
→
10/22 18:59, , 24F
10/22 18:59, 24F
※ 編輯: chris09 (60.246.217.162), 10/22/2016 19:00:18
噓
10/22 18:59, , 25F
10/22 18:59, 25F
噓
10/22 19:00, , 26F
10/22 19:00, 26F
→
10/22 19:00, , 27F
10/22 19:00, 27F
→
10/22 19:00, , 28F
10/22 19:00, 28F
推
10/22 19:00, , 29F
10/22 19:00, 29F
→
10/22 19:00, , 30F
10/22 19:00, 30F
→
10/22 19:00, , 31F
10/22 19:00, 31F
→
10/22 19:00, , 32F
10/22 19:00, 32F
→
10/22 19:01, , 33F
10/22 19:01, 33F
→
10/22 19:01, , 34F
10/22 19:01, 34F
噓
10/22 19:01, , 35F
10/22 19:01, 35F
→
10/22 19:01, , 36F
10/22 19:01, 36F
推
10/22 19:01, , 37F
10/22 19:01, 37F
推
10/22 19:01, , 38F
10/22 19:01, 38F
推
10/22 19:03, , 39F
10/22 19:03, 39F
→
10/22 19:05, , 40F
10/22 19:05, 40F
推
10/22 19:05, , 41F
10/22 19:05, 41F
推
10/22 19:06, , 42F
10/22 19:06, 42F
推
10/22 19:07, , 43F
10/22 19:07, 43F
→
10/22 19:07, , 44F
10/22 19:07, 44F
→
10/22 19:09, , 45F
10/22 19:09, 45F
→
10/22 19:09, , 46F
10/22 19:09, 46F
→
10/22 19:12, , 47F
10/22 19:12, 47F
噓
10/22 19:14, , 48F
10/22 19:14, 48F
推
10/22 19:20, , 49F
10/22 19:20, 49F
噓
10/22 19:20, , 50F
10/22 19:20, 50F
→
10/22 19:22, , 51F
10/22 19:22, 51F
噓
10/22 19:24, , 52F
10/22 19:24, 52F
→
10/22 19:25, , 53F
10/22 19:25, 53F
噓
10/22 19:26, , 54F
10/22 19:26, 54F
→
10/22 19:27, , 55F
10/22 19:27, 55F
噓
10/22 19:28, , 56F
10/22 19:28, 56F
推
10/22 19:30, , 57F
10/22 19:30, 57F
→
10/22 19:31, , 58F
10/22 19:31, 58F
推
10/22 19:31, , 59F
10/22 19:31, 59F
噓
10/22 19:31, , 60F
10/22 19:31, 60F
→
10/22 19:31, , 61F
10/22 19:31, 61F
噓
10/22 19:32, , 62F
10/22 19:32, 62F
推
10/22 19:46, , 63F
10/22 19:46, 63F
推
10/22 19:52, , 64F
10/22 19:52, 64F
噓
10/22 19:52, , 65F
10/22 19:52, 65F
噓
10/22 19:53, , 66F
10/22 19:53, 66F
推
10/22 20:00, , 67F
10/22 20:00, 67F
噓
10/22 20:07, , 68F
10/22 20:07, 68F
推
10/22 20:30, , 69F
10/22 20:30, 69F
→
10/22 20:30, , 70F
10/22 20:30, 70F
噓
10/22 20:40, , 71F
10/22 20:40, 71F
→
10/22 20:42, , 72F
10/22 20:42, 72F
→
10/22 21:18, , 73F
10/22 21:18, 73F
噓
10/22 21:20, , 74F
10/22 21:20, 74F
→
10/22 21:52, , 75F
10/22 21:52, 75F
→
10/23 13:23, , 76F
10/23 13:23, 76F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):