[問卦] 華航這次到底在反什麼?消失
剛剛看了蘋果的直播
看來看去好像最重要的就是
就是在反搭便車條款
有必要這樣嗎???
當初一開始在罷工
提這一點就覺得不太可能達成了
其他人怎麼可能同工不同酬
當初就覺得自嗨成分居多
有沒有這次的八卦???
一開始的與論過去了
感覺公司這次比較佔優勢
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.137.170.28
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1476426234.A.C9C.html
推
10/14 14:24, , 1F
10/14 14:24, 1F
推
10/14 14:25, , 2F
10/14 14:25, 2F
→
10/14 14:25, , 3F
10/14 14:25, 3F
推
10/14 14:25, , 4F
10/14 14:25, 4F
推
10/14 14:26, , 5F
10/14 14:26, 5F
噓
10/14 14:26, , 6F
10/14 14:26, 6F
推
10/14 14:26, , 7F
10/14 14:26, 7F
→
10/14 14:27, , 8F
10/14 14:27, 8F
→
10/14 14:29, , 9F
10/14 14:29, 9F
→
10/14 14:29, , 10F
10/14 14:29, 10F
推
10/14 14:30, , 11F
10/14 14:30, 11F
推
10/14 14:30, , 12F
10/14 14:30, 12F
反反搭便車的概念 於情於理說不太過去
大概一次性的福利比較有可能
推
10/14 14:31, , 13F
10/14 14:31, 13F
等於變相鬥非公會 炮口不一致 感覺成功機率小很多
推
10/14 14:32, , 14F
10/14 14:32, 14F
※ 編輯: HoterLin (220.137.170.28), 10/14/2016 14:34:48
→
10/14 14:36, , 15F
10/14 14:36, 15F
推
10/14 14:54, , 16F
10/14 14:54, 16F
→
10/14 14:54, , 17F
10/14 14:54, 17F
推
10/14 15:12, , 18F
10/14 15:12, 18F
噓
10/14 15:46, , 19F
10/14 15:46, 19F
推
10/14 16:24, , 20F
10/14 16:24, 20F
推
10/14 16:41, , 21F
10/14 16:41, 21F
噓
10/14 16:57, , 22F
10/14 16:57, 22F
→
10/14 16:57, , 23F
10/14 16:57, 23F
→
10/14 16:57, , 24F
10/14 16:57, 24F
→
10/14 16:57, , 25F
10/14 16:57, 25F
推
10/14 17:58, , 26F
10/14 17:58, 26F
→
10/14 17:59, , 27F
10/14 17:59, 27F
噓
10/14 18:54, , 28F
10/14 18:54, 28F
→
10/14 18:54, , 29F
10/14 18:54, 29F
→
10/14 18:54, , 30F
10/14 18:54, 30F
推
10/14 23:09, , 31F
10/14 23:09, 31F
→
10/14 23:29, , 32F
10/14 23:29, 32F
噓
10/15 00:11, , 33F
10/15 00:11, 33F
推
10/16 00:45, , 34F
10/16 00:45, 34F
討論串 (同標題文章)