[新聞] 內湖女童小燈泡案 凶嫌:關出來趕快找工作消失
內湖女童小燈泡案 凶嫌:關出來趕快找工作
內湖女童小燈泡命案,士林地院今天開庭審理,針對凶手王景玉是否有教化可能,精神狀態鑑定人人選,檢、辯雙方展開激辯。法官諭知,將原本囑託台大心理系助理教授趙儀珊,改由心理學博士陳若璋,實際鑑定日期將再排定,而王景玉出庭,眼神呆滯,身型越來越瘦,他重複告訴法官:「判我輕一點,關5、6年出來,要趕快找工作賺錢,家裡是中低收入戶。」訊後還押。
王辯護律師黃致豪上次開庭主張由趙儀珊進行教化可能鑑定,但趙主動告訴法院,她是辯護律師就讀博士班的指導教授,檢察官認為,對於利害關係有所衝突,恐怕會影響鑑定結果的公正性。
但黃提出反駁,趙是「唯一」在司法心理的專家,遍尋6所大專院校、26名教授,找不到受過正統司法心理的訓練的專家,如果檢方的推論屬實,那他與松德醫院院長合著出書,其他專家共同進行學術研究,是否以後只要當事人有精神疾病,他就不能擔任辯護人。
檢方認為趙並非「唯一」專家,可由陳若璋擔任鑑定人,但黃認為,他研究方法所使用的量表,並沒有合法版權,使用「盜版」的工具,公正性會受到質疑。
至於鑑定的內容,雙方都希望對於王景玉成長過程進行訪談,不只限於父母、師長而已,法官當庭要求王寫下最好的朋友、最壞的朋友、擔任戰車駕駛兵時的車長姓名等等,而王稱自己沒交過女朋友,個性孤僻,但對於小時候曾經被欺負的過程,都記得很清楚,將透過鑑定釐清,是否受創傷影響未來人格養成。
雙方對於鑑定內容沒有意見,但黃致豪表示,鑑定人更換他要聲明異議,認為法院應調查對被告有利的證據,而趙儀珊的鑑定結果對被告有利,不應更換。法官諭知,將對被告人格的發展史等4大項目進行鑑定。
中時電子報
https://goo.gl/Ic2Ys1
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.240.69.227
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1476279915.A.B7C.html
推
10/12 21:45, , 1F
10/12 21:45, 1F
噓
10/12 21:45, , 2F
10/12 21:45, 2F
噓
10/12 21:46, , 3F
10/12 21:46, 3F
→
10/12 21:46, , 4F
10/12 21:46, 4F
噓
10/12 21:46, , 5F
10/12 21:46, 5F
噓
10/12 21:46, , 6F
10/12 21:46, 6F
推
10/12 21:46, , 7F
10/12 21:46, 7F
噓
10/12 21:46, , 8F
10/12 21:46, 8F
推
10/12 21:46, , 9F
10/12 21:46, 9F
噓
10/12 21:46, , 10F
10/12 21:46, 10F
推
10/12 21:47, , 11F
10/12 21:47, 11F
→
10/12 21:47, , 12F
10/12 21:47, 12F
→
10/12 21:47, , 13F
10/12 21:47, 13F
噓
10/12 21:47, , 14F
10/12 21:47, 14F
噓
10/12 21:47, , 15F
10/12 21:47, 15F
噓
10/12 21:47, , 16F
10/12 21:47, 16F
→
10/12 21:47, , 17F
10/12 21:47, 17F
推
10/12 21:47, , 18F
10/12 21:47, 18F
→
10/12 21:47, , 19F
10/12 21:47, 19F
推
10/12 21:47, , 20F
10/12 21:47, 20F
→
10/12 21:47, , 21F
10/12 21:47, 21F
噓
10/12 21:47, , 22F
10/12 21:47, 22F
推
10/12 21:48, , 23F
10/12 21:48, 23F
噓
10/12 21:48, , 24F
10/12 21:48, 24F
→
10/12 21:48, , 25F
10/12 21:48, 25F
噓
10/12 21:49, , 26F
10/12 21:49, 26F
噓
10/12 21:49, , 27F
10/12 21:49, 27F
→
10/12 21:50, , 28F
10/12 21:50, 28F
推
10/12 21:50, , 29F
10/12 21:50, 29F
→
10/12 21:52, , 30F
10/12 21:52, 30F
噓
10/12 21:53, , 31F
10/12 21:53, 31F
噓
10/12 21:54, , 32F
10/12 21:54, 32F
噓
10/12 21:55, , 33F
10/12 21:55, 33F
→
10/12 21:55, , 34F
10/12 21:55, 34F
噓
10/12 21:56, , 35F
10/12 21:56, 35F
→
10/12 21:56, , 36F
10/12 21:56, 36F
→
10/12 22:00, , 37F
10/12 22:00, 37F
→
10/12 22:01, , 38F
10/12 22:01, 38F
噓
10/12 22:03, , 39F
10/12 22:03, 39F
噓
10/12 22:08, , 40F
10/12 22:08, 40F
噓
10/12 22:09, , 41F
10/12 22:09, 41F
噓
10/12 22:10, , 42F
10/12 22:10, 42F
→
10/12 22:10, , 43F
10/12 22:10, 43F
噓
10/12 22:11, , 44F
10/12 22:11, 44F
推
10/12 22:12, , 45F
10/12 22:12, 45F
推
10/12 22:13, , 46F
10/12 22:13, 46F
噓
10/12 22:14, , 47F
10/12 22:14, 47F
→
10/12 22:19, , 48F
10/12 22:19, 48F
噓
10/12 22:24, , 49F
10/12 22:24, 49F
→
10/12 22:24, , 50F
10/12 22:24, 50F
推
10/12 22:30, , 51F
10/12 22:30, 51F
推
10/12 22:33, , 52F
10/12 22:33, 52F
噓
10/12 22:38, , 53F
10/12 22:38, 53F
噓
10/12 22:43, , 54F
10/12 22:43, 54F
→
10/12 22:43, , 55F
10/12 22:43, 55F
噓
10/12 22:44, , 56F
10/12 22:44, 56F
噓
10/12 22:51, , 57F
10/12 22:51, 57F
推
10/12 22:57, , 58F
10/12 22:57, 58F
噓
10/12 23:18, , 59F
10/12 23:18, 59F
推
10/12 23:44, , 60F
10/12 23:44, 60F
→
10/12 23:47, , 61F
10/12 23:47, 61F
噓
10/13 00:45, , 62F
10/13 00:45, 62F
噓
10/13 02:28, , 63F
10/13 02:28, 63F
噓
10/13 06:05, , 64F
10/13 06:05, 64F
→
10/13 10:09, , 65F
10/13 10:09, 65F
推
10/13 13:44, , 66F
10/13 13:44, 66F
噓
10/13 13:47, , 67F
10/13 13:47, 67F
推
10/13 13:49, , 68F
10/13 13:49, 68F
→
10/13 13:49, , 69F
10/13 13:49, 69F
→
10/13 14:09, , 70F
10/13 14:09, 70F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):