[問卦] 為什麼少數人認為中華民國=中國?消失
ROC中華民國可以簡稱中華國
中民國
華民國
中華台灣國
中台國
你爽就好
最簡單就是台灣,是事實也是無可反駁
反駁只是狗吠火車而已
但是
中華民國絕對 =\= 中國
中國=支那=中華人民共和國=PROC=鄰國
=敵國
不要偷用敵國的國名好嗎?
維大力永遠不會變義大利OK?
台灣不是支那國的一部份
台灣是主權獨立國家不需要獨立
這是事實是定律不可逆
為什麼少數不俱代表性的人不懂呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.216.66.162
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1475398674.A.10F.html
推
10/02 16:58, , 1F
10/02 16:58, 1F
→
10/02 16:58, , 2F
10/02 16:58, 2F
→
10/02 16:58, , 3F
10/02 16:58, 3F
英文=/=中文
噓
10/02 16:58, , 4F
10/02 16:58, 4F
中原國 支那國
噓
10/02 16:58, , 5F
10/02 16:58, 5F
→
10/02 16:59, , 6F
10/02 16:59, 6F
→
10/02 16:59, , 7F
10/02 16:59, 7F
→
10/02 16:59, , 8F
10/02 16:59, 8F
哈哈
→
10/02 16:59, , 9F
10/02 16:59, 9F
→
10/02 16:59, , 10F
10/02 16:59, 10F
推
10/02 16:59, , 11F
10/02 16:59, 11F
→
10/02 16:59, , 12F
10/02 16:59, 12F
美國人以前也住英國啊
→
10/02 16:59, , 13F
10/02 16:59, 13F
※ 編輯: IamYourDaddy (49.216.66.162), 10/02/2016 17:01:01
→
10/02 16:59, , 14F
10/02 16:59, 14F
推
10/02 16:59, , 15F
10/02 16:59, 15F
推
10/02 16:59, , 16F
10/02 16:59, 16F
推
10/02 16:59, , 17F
10/02 16:59, 17F
真不懂
→
10/02 16:59, , 18F
10/02 16:59, 18F
→
10/02 17:00, , 19F
10/02 17:00, 19F
誰跟你同胞
推
10/02 17:00, , 20F
10/02 17:00, 20F
身份證拿出來是寫中國逆
華民不見了?
推
10/02 17:00, , 21F
10/02 17:00, 21F
不合理
華民國ok
推
10/02 17:00, , 22F
10/02 17:00, 22F
有點是
→
10/02 17:01, , 23F
10/02 17:01, 23F
哈哈
我還沒下餌急什麼
→
10/02 17:01, , 24F
10/02 17:01, 24F
※ 編輯: IamYourDaddy (49.216.66.162), 10/02/2016 17:04:11
→
10/02 17:01, , 25F
10/02 17:01, 25F
→
10/02 17:01, , 26F
10/02 17:01, 26F
→
10/02 17:01, , 27F
10/02 17:01, 27F
還有 43 則推文
還有 11 段內文
推
10/02 18:13, , 71F
10/02 18:13, 71F
推
10/02 18:21, , 72F
10/02 18:21, 72F
→
10/02 18:23, , 73F
10/02 18:23, 73F
噓
10/02 18:41, , 74F
10/02 18:41, 74F
噓
10/02 18:47, , 75F
10/02 18:47, 75F
噓
10/02 18:49, , 76F
10/02 18:49, 76F
推
10/02 19:04, , 77F
10/02 19:04, 77F
→
10/02 19:04, , 78F
10/02 19:04, 78F
噓
10/02 19:16, , 79F
10/02 19:16, 79F
→
10/02 19:20, , 80F
10/02 19:20, 80F
→
10/02 19:27, , 81F
10/02 19:27, 81F
→
10/02 19:28, , 82F
10/02 19:28, 82F
推
10/02 20:06, , 83F
10/02 20:06, 83F
推
10/02 20:07, , 84F
10/02 20:07, 84F
→
10/02 20:07, , 85F
10/02 20:07, 85F
推
10/02 20:15, , 86F
10/02 20:15, 86F
噓
10/02 20:25, , 87F
10/02 20:25, 87F
推
10/02 20:28, , 88F
10/02 20:28, 88F
推
10/02 20:31, , 89F
10/02 20:31, 89F
噓
10/02 20:32, , 90F
10/02 20:32, 90F
→
10/02 20:44, , 91F
10/02 20:44, 91F
噓
10/02 20:45, , 92F
10/02 20:45, 92F
噓
10/02 21:03, , 93F
10/02 21:03, 93F
噓
10/02 21:05, , 94F
10/02 21:05, 94F
噓
10/02 21:14, , 95F
10/02 21:14, 95F
噓
10/02 22:34, , 96F
10/02 22:34, 96F
噓
10/03 08:58, , 97F
10/03 08:58, 97F
→
10/03 09:22, , 98F
10/03 09:22, 98F
噓
10/03 09:51, , 99F
10/03 09:51, 99F
噓
10/03 10:01, , 100F
10/03 10:01, 100F
推
10/03 10:59, , 101F
10/03 10:59, 101F
→
10/03 11:12, , 102F
10/03 11:12, 102F
噓
10/03 11:33, , 103F
10/03 11:33, 103F
→
10/03 11:54, , 104F
10/03 11:54, 104F
推
10/03 12:16, , 105F
10/03 12:16, 105F
噓
10/03 12:16, , 106F
10/03 12:16, 106F
噓
10/03 13:04, , 107F
10/03 13:04, 107F
噓
10/03 14:35, , 108F
10/03 14:35, 108F
噓
10/03 14:51, , 109F
10/03 14:51, 109F
推
10/03 21:25, , 110F
10/03 21:25, 110F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 22 篇):