[問卦] Line有超越當年的即時通和MSN嗎消失
餓死抬頭
小魯弟是7年級最後段班
從小五學會上網開始 就在用即時通
之後大一就被FB取代了 漸漸的出了社會也不愛用FB
身邊的家人朋友同事 就算沒有FB也一定會有Line
現在根本被Line綁死
沒了Line 一對一要找的話 電話或iMessage都還找得到
但一些重要群組在討論事情就很麻煩 ..
現在line在台灣的重要性是否遠超過當年即時通跟MSN呀
明明好用的通訊軟體那麼多
為什麼line還是屹立不搖呢 o'_'o 借問有卦嗎
一對人說Line很爛 又到底是爛在哪
(我只知道iPad和watch的line爛到有剩)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.219.255.94
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1475116036.A.BCA.html
→
09/29 10:27, , 1F
09/29 10:27, 1F
也是
推
09/29 10:27, , 2F
09/29 10:27, 2F
噓
09/29 10:27, , 3F
09/29 10:27, 3F
小魯弟一直不太懂 手機版用得蠻順的 到底有哪些地方讓那麼多人說爛呢
→
09/29 10:27, , 4F
09/29 10:27, 4F
推
09/29 10:28, , 5F
09/29 10:28, 5F
真的沒有其他軟體在台灣幹得掉line了嗎..
※ 編輯: chimouse (61.219.255.94), 09/29/2016 10:30:06
→
09/29 10:28, , 6F
09/29 10:28, 6F
→
09/29 10:29, , 7F
09/29 10:29, 7F
推
09/29 10:29, , 8F
09/29 10:29, 8F
推
09/29 10:30, , 9F
09/29 10:30, 9F
→
09/29 10:30, , 10F
09/29 10:30, 10F
推
09/29 10:31, , 11F
09/29 10:31, 11F
推
09/29 10:31, , 12F
09/29 10:31, 12F
→
09/29 10:31, , 13F
09/29 10:31, 13F
→
09/29 10:32, , 14F
09/29 10:32, 14F
→
09/29 10:32, , 15F
09/29 10:32, 15F
→
09/29 10:32, , 16F
09/29 10:32, 16F
等等載來試
→
09/29 10:32, , 17F
09/29 10:32, 17F
→
09/29 10:34, , 18F
09/29 10:34, 18F
幫自己QQ
推
09/29 10:34, , 19F
09/29 10:34, 19F
推
09/29 10:34, , 20F
09/29 10:34, 20F
昨天去賣場補貨 好多國中小都有哀鳳拿 嘖嘖
→
09/29 10:35, , 21F
09/29 10:35, 21F
小弟也有用MSN啦 只是即時通佔了大多數童年
推
09/29 10:36, , 22F
09/29 10:36, 22F
※ 編輯: chimouse (61.219.255.94), 09/29/2016 10:39:12
推
09/29 10:38, , 23F
09/29 10:38, 23F
推
09/29 10:38, , 24F
09/29 10:38, 24F
→
09/29 10:38, , 25F
09/29 10:38, 25F
推
09/29 10:40, , 26F
09/29 10:40, 26F
→
09/29 10:43, , 27F
09/29 10:43, 27F
→
09/29 10:44, , 28F
09/29 10:44, 28F
→
09/29 10:44, , 29F
09/29 10:44, 29F
→
09/29 10:44, , 30F
09/29 10:44, 30F
→
09/29 10:44, , 31F
09/29 10:44, 31F
推
09/29 10:46, , 32F
09/29 10:46, 32F
噓
09/29 10:49, , 33F
09/29 10:49, 33F
→
09/29 10:49, , 34F
09/29 10:49, 34F
推
09/29 10:52, , 35F
09/29 10:52, 35F
推
09/29 10:52, , 36F
09/29 10:52, 36F
推
09/29 10:53, , 37F
09/29 10:53, 37F
推
09/29 10:53, , 38F
09/29 10:53, 38F
推
09/29 10:54, , 39F
09/29 10:54, 39F
噓
09/29 10:55, , 40F
09/29 10:55, 40F
推
09/29 10:56, , 41F
09/29 10:56, 41F
推
09/29 10:58, , 42F
09/29 10:58, 42F
推
09/29 11:00, , 43F
09/29 11:00, 43F
推
09/29 11:03, , 44F
09/29 11:03, 44F
推
09/29 11:03, , 45F
09/29 11:03, 45F
→
09/29 11:04, , 46F
09/29 11:04, 46F
推
09/29 11:09, , 47F
09/29 11:09, 47F
推
09/29 11:09, , 48F
09/29 11:09, 48F
推
09/29 11:16, , 49F
09/29 11:16, 49F
→
09/29 11:20, , 50F
09/29 11:20, 50F
推
09/29 11:21, , 51F
09/29 11:21, 51F
推
09/29 11:25, , 52F
09/29 11:25, 52F
推
09/29 11:27, , 53F
09/29 11:27, 53F
推
09/29 11:33, , 54F
09/29 11:33, 54F
推
09/29 11:34, , 55F
09/29 11:34, 55F
→
09/29 11:37, , 56F
09/29 11:37, 56F
推
09/29 11:38, , 57F
09/29 11:38, 57F
推
09/29 11:39, , 58F
09/29 11:39, 58F
推
09/29 11:40, , 59F
09/29 11:40, 59F
→
09/29 11:42, , 60F
09/29 11:42, 60F
推
09/29 11:44, , 61F
09/29 11:44, 61F
推
09/29 11:49, , 62F
09/29 11:49, 62F
推
09/29 12:01, , 63F
09/29 12:01, 63F
推
09/29 12:12, , 64F
09/29 12:12, 64F
噓
09/29 12:13, , 65F
09/29 12:13, 65F
推
09/29 12:17, , 66F
09/29 12:17, 66F
推
09/29 12:24, , 67F
09/29 12:24, 67F
推
09/29 12:36, , 68F
09/29 12:36, 68F
推
09/29 12:38, , 69F
09/29 12:38, 69F
→
09/29 12:52, , 70F
09/29 12:52, 70F
推
09/29 13:03, , 71F
09/29 13:03, 71F
推
09/29 13:09, , 72F
09/29 13:09, 72F
推
09/29 13:13, , 73F
09/29 13:13, 73F
推
09/29 13:16, , 74F
09/29 13:16, 74F
→
09/29 13:17, , 75F
09/29 13:17, 75F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):