[問卦] 輔大性侵案,巫小姐那邊是已經施壓完畢?消失
好奇怪哦,夏林清和她老公鄭村棋的最新發言,如此的一致
都是要大家去問受害人巫小姐
鄭村棋小弟看到是這次事件頭一次發表他的看法,在政論節目裡能言善道、砲火四射
但是對案件沒發表多餘觀點,也沒有做出什麼論述或對其他知名人物言論進行反駁
就只有叫大家去問巫小姐
是巫小姐現在已經被他們控制住,確定會說出對他們有利的言論嗎?
有掛嗎?很顯然他們已經統一好,決定要採取這樣的策略,逼巫小姐出來說明
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.175.144.98
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1474648703.A.147.html
→
09/24 00:39, , 1F
09/24 00:39, 1F
推
09/24 00:39, , 2F
09/24 00:39, 2F
推
09/24 00:39, , 3F
09/24 00:39, 3F
→
09/24 00:40, , 4F
09/24 00:40, 4F
這或許是他們的策略,輔大校方嚴禁他們校內去騷擾巫,以免造成二次傷害
要是有記者白木去主動採訪,應該也是被大家公幹吧
除非是巫小姐自己出來發表聲明
可能他們是想用這招,將討論終止,迴避掉其他人對他們的質疑吧?
我是比較擔心他們的惡勢力,已經對巫小姐動完手腳了
※ 編輯: startwinkle (1.175.144.98), 09/24/2016 00:43:40
推
09/24 00:41, , 5F
09/24 00:41, 5F
推
09/24 00:42, , 6F
09/24 00:42, 6F
→
09/24 00:42, , 7F
09/24 00:42, 7F
→
09/24 00:43, , 8F
09/24 00:43, 8F
推
09/24 00:44, , 9F
09/24 00:44, 9F
→
09/24 00:44, , 10F
09/24 00:44, 10F
※ 編輯: startwinkle (1.175.144.98), 09/24/2016 00:45:56
推
09/24 00:45, , 11F
09/24 00:45, 11F
→
09/24 00:45, , 12F
09/24 00:45, 12F
→
09/24 00:45, , 13F
09/24 00:45, 13F
推
09/24 00:46, , 14F
09/24 00:46, 14F
我也覺得要是巫小姐站出來指控,夏黨不就團滅了?
所以怕就怕在,他們是有絕對的自信巫小姐不會這樣做,因為已經動完手腳了
推
09/24 00:46, , 15F
09/24 00:46, 15F
※ 編輯: startwinkle (1.175.144.98), 09/24/2016 00:47:28
→
09/24 00:46, , 16F
09/24 00:46, 16F
推
09/24 00:46, , 17F
09/24 00:46, 17F
→
09/24 00:46, , 18F
09/24 00:46, 18F
→
09/24 00:47, , 19F
09/24 00:47, 19F
推
09/24 00:47, , 20F
09/24 00:47, 20F
→
09/24 00:47, , 21F
09/24 00:47, 21F
→
09/24 00:47, , 22F
09/24 00:47, 22F
→
09/24 00:47, , 23F
09/24 00:47, 23F
→
09/24 00:48, , 24F
09/24 00:48, 24F
→
09/24 00:48, , 25F
09/24 00:48, 25F
→
09/24 00:49, , 26F
09/24 00:49, 26F
推
09/24 00:49, , 27F
09/24 00:49, 27F
推
09/24 00:50, , 28F
09/24 00:50, 28F
→
09/24 00:51, , 29F
09/24 00:51, 29F
→
09/24 00:51, , 30F
09/24 00:51, 30F
→
09/24 00:51, , 31F
09/24 00:51, 31F
→
09/24 00:51, , 32F
09/24 00:51, 32F
→
09/24 00:51, , 33F
09/24 00:51, 33F
推
09/24 00:56, , 34F
09/24 00:56, 34F
→
09/24 00:56, , 35F
09/24 00:56, 35F
→
09/24 00:57, , 36F
09/24 00:57, 36F
推
09/24 00:57, , 37F
09/24 00:57, 37F
→
09/24 00:57, , 38F
09/24 00:57, 38F
推
09/24 00:58, , 39F
09/24 00:58, 39F
推
09/24 01:00, , 40F
09/24 01:00, 40F
推
09/24 01:00, , 41F
09/24 01:00, 41F
推
09/24 01:05, , 42F
09/24 01:05, 42F
→
09/24 01:05, , 43F
09/24 01:05, 43F
噓
09/24 01:05, , 44F
09/24 01:05, 44F
→
09/24 01:07, , 45F
09/24 01:07, 45F
噓
09/24 01:27, , 46F
09/24 01:27, 46F
噓
09/24 01:29, , 47F
09/24 01:29, 47F
推
09/24 01:32, , 48F
09/24 01:32, 48F
→
09/24 01:33, , 49F
09/24 01:33, 49F
→
09/24 01:33, , 50F
09/24 01:33, 50F
→
09/24 01:34, , 51F
09/24 01:34, 51F
→
09/24 01:34, , 52F
09/24 01:34, 52F
推
09/24 01:34, , 53F
09/24 01:34, 53F
→
09/24 01:35, , 54F
09/24 01:35, 54F
→
09/24 01:36, , 55F
09/24 01:36, 55F
推
09/24 01:36, , 56F
09/24 01:36, 56F
→
09/24 01:36, , 57F
09/24 01:36, 57F
→
09/24 01:37, , 58F
09/24 01:37, 58F
推
09/24 01:59, , 59F
09/24 01:59, 59F
推
09/24 02:19, , 60F
09/24 02:19, 60F
推
09/24 02:23, , 61F
09/24 02:23, 61F
推
09/24 02:54, , 62F
09/24 02:54, 62F
推
09/24 02:59, , 63F
09/24 02:59, 63F
→
09/24 03:00, , 64F
09/24 03:00, 64F
→
09/24 03:02, , 65F
09/24 03:02, 65F
推
09/24 03:04, , 66F
09/24 03:04, 66F
→
09/24 03:09, , 67F
09/24 03:09, 67F
→
09/24 03:09, , 68F
09/24 03:09, 68F
推
09/24 03:09, , 69F
09/24 03:09, 69F
→
09/24 03:15, , 70F
09/24 03:15, 70F
噓
09/24 03:19, , 71F
09/24 03:19, 71F
→
09/24 03:19, , 72F
09/24 03:19, 72F
推
09/24 03:23, , 73F
09/24 03:23, 73F
推
09/24 03:28, , 74F
09/24 03:28, 74F
推
09/24 03:31, , 75F
09/24 03:31, 75F
→
09/24 03:36, , 76F
09/24 03:36, 76F
→
09/24 04:18, , 77F
09/24 04:18, 77F
噓
09/24 07:00, , 78F
09/24 07:00, 78F
推
09/24 08:51, , 79F
09/24 08:51, 79F
噓
09/24 09:13, , 80F
09/24 09:13, 80F
推
09/24 11:24, , 81F
09/24 11:24, 81F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):