Re: [新聞] 「一例一休」引發反彈 總統：很大的挑戰消失
我先前已對此問題先發過一篇，在看各相關此話題文章及各政論節目
我覺得最大盲點在週休二日初衷哪？是降低總工時而不是加班費增加
勞動部搞錯問題癥結
再來勞基法例假已限縮加班條件不可否認
所以只要在休假日加班須強制補休一日
這樣可換取加班之彈性又可確實降低工時
當然另外問題癥結是勞檢須確實罰則須加重
在此澄清我非假中立我長期是綠營支持者
在目前勞動部版本我非常失望及憤怒
我只期望在此理性討論
綠營立委不要在那硬護航只會越說越扯
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.136.222.48
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1467300994.A.CE6.html
→
06/30 23:37, , 1F
06/30 23:37, 1F
推
06/30 23:37, , 2F
06/30 23:37, 2F
→
06/30 23:37, , 3F
06/30 23:37, 3F
推
06/30 23:38, , 4F
06/30 23:38, 4F
→
06/30 23:38, , 5F
06/30 23:38, 5F
→
06/30 23:39, , 6F
06/30 23:39, 6F
推
06/30 23:41, , 7F
06/30 23:41, 7F
→
06/30 23:42, , 8F
06/30 23:42, 8F
推
06/30 23:45, , 9F
06/30 23:45, 9F
→
06/30 23:47, , 10F
06/30 23:47, 10F
→
06/30 23:48, , 11F
06/30 23:48, 11F
推
06/30 23:50, , 12F
06/30 23:50, 12F
→
06/30 23:52, , 13F
06/30 23:52, 13F
→
06/30 23:53, , 14F
06/30 23:53, 14F
→
06/30 23:54, , 15F
06/30 23:54, 15F
→
06/30 23:55, , 16F
06/30 23:55, 16F
→
06/30 23:55, , 17F
06/30 23:55, 17F
→
06/30 23:55, , 18F
06/30 23:55, 18F
→
06/30 23:55, , 19F
06/30 23:55, 19F
→
06/30 23:58, , 20F
06/30 23:58, 20F
→
06/30 23:58, , 21F
06/30 23:58, 21F
推
06/30 23:59, , 22F
06/30 23:59, 22F
→
07/01 00:00, , 23F
07/01 00:00, 23F
→
07/01 00:01, , 24F
07/01 00:01, 24F
→
07/01 00:02, , 25F
07/01 00:02, 25F
→
07/01 00:02, , 26F
07/01 00:02, 26F
→
07/01 00:03, , 27F
07/01 00:03, 27F
→
07/01 00:03, , 28F
07/01 00:03, 28F
→
07/01 00:03, , 29F
07/01 00:03, 29F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 33 之 35 篇)：