Re: [爆卦] 亞綸雨水地震論受國際證實!!消失

看板Gossiping作者時間8年前 (2016/04/29 10:18), 編輯推噓9(47推 38噓 39→)
留言124則, 88人參與, 最新討論串2/3 (看更多)
話說本蛇看完內文之後覺得這篇有點標題殺人這篇文獻的意思並不是今天下幾場大雨就會馬上發生地震是地殼深部的流體改變斷層的應力狀態導致破裂引發地震然後他去分析了這些「流體」的組成以天水（Meteoric fluids）為主，變質和地函流體次之，所謂天水，顧名思義就是天上降下的水，包含雨雪等都算天水，所以鄉民白高潮惹跟炎教授的論述還有段差距哦我的觀察啦～※ 引述《s87623 (肛棍洩濕婦)》之銘言：: ※註:有電視或媒體有報導者，請勿使用爆卦! 未滿20字 一行文 退文: 咱們亞綸先知發表過的雨水地震理論: 受到國際研究的證實: 當年華生發現DNA雙股螺旋結構也是靈機一動: 後來才證實模型是正確的: 這跟亞綸發現雨水地震說的過程有九成像: 期待亞綸成為台灣影視圈、學術圈雙棲的第一人!!!: Paper:(完整版含數據:http://goo.gl/x7ZbW9): Rainwater may play an important role in the process that triggers earthquakes: 27 April 2016 Southampton, University of: It's the rain's Fault: Rainwater may play an important role in the process that triggers earthquakes: , according to new research.: Researchers from the University of Southampton, GNS Science (New Zealand), the: University of Otago, and GFZ Potsdam (Germany), identified the sources and: fluxes of the geothermal fluids and mineral veins from the Southern Alps of: New Zealand where the Pacific and Australian Plates collide along the Alpine: Fault.: From careful chemical analyses, they discovered that fluids originating from: the mantle, the layer below the Earth's crust, and fluids derived from: rainwater, are channelled up the Alpine Fault.: By calculating how much fluid is flowing through the fault zone at depth, the: researchers showed for the first time that enough rainwater is present to: promote earthquake rupture on this major plate boundary fault.: Lead researcher Dr Catriona Menzies, from Ocean and Earth Science at the: University of Southampton, said: "Large, continental-scale faults can cause: catastrophic earthquakes, but the trigger mechanisms for major seismic events: are not well known. Geologists have long suspected that deep groundwaters may: be important for the initiation of earthquakes as these fluids can weaken the: fault zones by increasing pressures or through chemical reactions.: "Fluids are important in controlling the evolution of faults between earthquake: ruptures. Chemical reactions may alter the strength and permeability of rocks: , and if enough fluid is present at sufficiently high pressures they may aid: earthquake rupture by 'pumping up' the fault zone.": The Alpine Fault is a major strike-slip fault, like the San Andreas, that fails: in very large (Magnitude 8+) earthquakes around every 300 years. It last: ruptured in 1717 AD and consequently it is under intense scientific scrutiny: because it is a rare example of a major fault that is late in the strain-build: up before rupture.: Dr Menzies said: "We show that the Alpine Fault acts as a barrier to lateral: fluid flow from the high mountains of the Southern Alps towards the Tasman Sea: in the west. However, the presence of mantle-derived fluids indicates that the: fault also acts as a channel for fluids, from more than 35 km depth, to ascend: to the surface.: "As well as mantle derived fluids, our calculations indicate that 0.02-0.05 per: cent of surface rainfall reaches around six kilometres depth but this is enough: to overwhelm contributions from the mantle and fluids generated during: mountain-building by metamorphic reactions in hot rocks. This rainwater is then: focused onto the fault, forced by the hydraulic head of the high mountains: above and the sub-vertical fluid flow barrier of the Alpine Fault.": Funding for this research, published in Earth and Planetary Science Letters: , was provided by the Natural Environmental Research Council (NERC): , Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, and GNS Science (New Zealand).--※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 27.147.57.218※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1461896313.A.136.html
推
04/29 10:18, , 1F
火火你敢嘴
04/29 10:18, 1F
推
04/29 10:19, , 2F
天水感覺很帥
04/29 10:19, 2F
噓
04/29 10:19, , 3F
再次驗證一群英文白癡 不看內文只看標題
04/29 10:19, 3F
噓
04/29 10:19, , 4F
你怎麼可以質疑炎神的理論
04/29 10:19, 4F
→
04/29 10:20, , 5F
不管!! 綸綸還是有這段論述的基石
04/29 10:20, 5F
噓
04/29 10:20, , 6F
炎教授一定要把所有可能講給你聽? 你誰阿
04/29 10:20, 6F
推
04/29 10:20, , 7F
ㄋ翻譯系
04/29 10:20, 7F
噓
04/29 10:20, , 8F
亞倫大神你敢嘴 ？
04/29 10:20, 8F
→
04/29 10:21, , 9F
你英文系逆?
04/29 10:21, 9F
推
04/29 10:21, , 10F
推認真
04/29 10:21, 10F
推
04/29 10:21, , 11F
意思差不多阿 也是說下雨有可能導致地震
04/29 10:21, 11F
不太一樣雨水變成地下水循環到地層中是需要時間的說是下雨造成地震並不那麼精確
噓
04/29 10:21, , 12F
亞倫大神你敢嘴 ？
04/29 10:21, 12F
※ 編輯: popgsct (27.147.57.218), 04/29/2016 10:23:35
推
04/29 10:21, , 13F
我們炎炎只是講個摘要好嗎?! 要詳細論述請密他
04/29 10:21, 13F
→
04/29 10:21, , 14F
當初那些酸民是怎麼笑亞綸的
04/29 10:21, 14F
推
04/29 10:22, , 15F
就說有九成像了 一成不像的就只有時間點而以
04/29 10:22, 15F
噓
04/29 10:22, , 16F
亞綸有說夏幾場大雨就馬上地震嗎 先知豈是你能嘴的?
04/29 10:22, 16F
→
04/29 10:22, , 17F
我記得類似的研究跟學說在當初事件不久就被提過 也被炎亞
04/29 10:22, 17F
噓
04/29 10:22, , 18F
跟雨一樣有關係阿 炎教授那叫概論
04/29 10:22, 18F
→
04/29 10:22, , 19F
綸自己用來擋駕用
04/29 10:22, 19F
推
04/29 10:23, , 20F
起碼證明炎的理論有討論空間，酸民太廢
04/29 10:23, 20F
推
04/29 10:23, , 21F
意思差不多+1
04/29 10:23, 21F
噓
04/29 10:23, , 22F
炎教授在fb上只是概述而已 文章太長誰看啊
04/29 10:23, 22F
推
04/29 10:23, , 23F
我平生最痛恨的就是別人說我白高潮
04/29 10:23, 23F
推
04/29 10:23, , 24F
不要嘴先知 人家說的也有一成像
04/29 10:23, 24F
推
04/29 10:23, , 25F
應該 沒人會認為下大雨就地震 當初亞綸也沒說一定這樣 原
04/29 10:23, 25F
→
04/29 10:24, , 26F
火火唯一錯的只有時間點但是雨跟地震確實有相關
04/29 10:24, 26F
→
04/29 10:24, , 27F
文也是這樣講
04/29 10:24, 27F
噓
04/29 10:24, , 28F
不管啦 地質系永遠是對的
04/29 10:24, 28F
→
04/29 10:24, , 29F
話說這個期刊的IF在這領域到底高不高啊…<5
04/29 10:24, 29F
推
04/29 10:24, , 30F
反正大家都不看內文 隨便下個標題就奉人為神 幫QQ
04/29 10:24, 30F
噓
04/29 10:25, , 31F
他就是提出假說，現在已經被證實一部份，時間會證明一切
04/29 10:25, 31F
推
04/29 10:25, , 32F
我綸只是說了其中一種而已
04/29 10:25, 32F
推
04/29 10:25, , 33F
鄉民不接受假說啦，一定要寫在課本上才算數
04/29 10:25, 33F
→
04/29 10:26, , 34F
幹不就九成像
04/29 10:26, 34F
推
04/29 10:27, , 35F
假說ㄧ定要大膽啊
04/29 10:27, 35F
→
04/29 10:27, , 36F
雨就佔了天水90%
04/29 10:27, 36F
噓
04/29 10:27, , 37F
不可質疑你的炎教授
04/29 10:27, 37F
還有 52 則推文
還有 2 段內文
噓
04/29 10:50, , 90F
對藝人要求精準的學術理論 那學術界都是死人就對了
04/29 10:50, 90F
→
04/29 10:50, , 91F
鹼民水準 不意外
04/29 10:50, 91F
噓
04/29 10:52, , 92F
炎教授明明就是說一週的下雨，又沒說當天下當天地震，跟
04/29 10:52, 92F
→
04/29 10:52, , 93F
這報告完全符合，你自己沒搞懂別再丟人現眼了
04/29 10:52, 93F
反串?這篇文章討論的是300年+周期的斷層活動跟一週的時間尺度差在哪不用我特別說明吧~
→
04/29 10:53, , 94F
等炎教授發paper你就知道了
04/29 10:53, 94F
推
04/29 10:56, , 95F
直接跟間接因素
04/29 10:56, 95F
推
04/29 10:58, , 96F
推我的觀察啦
04/29 10:58, 96F
推
04/29 10:59, , 97F
我是比較好奇跟降雨速度和降雨量有沒有關係啦
04/29 10:59, 97F
推
04/29 10:59, , 98F
有認真有推
04/29 10:59, 98F
→
04/29 11:00, , 99F
有明顯關係的話 以後天氣預報颱風來了就要順便發個防震
04/29 11:00, 99F
推
04/29 11:04, , 100F
你這篇根本幫我綸助攻啊
04/29 11:04, 100F
※ 編輯: popgsct (27.147.57.218), 04/29/2016 11:09:28
噓
04/29 11:14, , 101F
這麼厲害你當初有反駁他時間點的問題嗎
04/29 11:14, 101F
推
04/29 11:16, , 102F
我發現很多人分不清 有關聯不等於有因果關係
04/29 11:16, 102F
推
04/29 11:18, , 103F
認真就輸了
04/29 11:18, 103F
噓
04/29 11:20, , 104F
要是那一週的下雨剛好是300年週期的尾巴呢？
04/29 11:20, 104F
對一般土壤雨水下滲補助地下水的速率是相當緩慢的很少超過 100 mm/Day更別說對一個數公里深的斷層破裂面而言那一週下的雨要在地層中跑多久才會到？不管是不是300年週期的尾巴，它的影絕對沒有那麼立即且快速
→
04/29 11:33, , 105F
敢嘴？
04/29 11:33, 105F
噓
04/29 11:33, , 106F
幹 人家導論只是提概念而已
04/29 11:33, 106F
※ 編輯: popgsct (27.147.57.218), 04/29/2016 11:44:38
噓
04/29 11:40, , 107F
別嘴亞神
04/29 11:40, 107F
※ 編輯: popgsct (27.147.57.218), 04/29/2016 11:45:31
推
04/29 11:46, , 108F
認真發文還要被嘴XDD
04/29 11:46, 108F
噓
04/29 11:47, , 109F
炎神
04/29 11:47, 109F
推
04/29 11:50, , 110F
你什麼態度！竟然質疑地質性權威
04/29 11:50, 110F
噓
04/29 12:06, , 111F
頗呵
04/29 12:06, 111F
推
04/29 12:06, , 112F
地質系的齁!
04/29 12:06, 112F
噓
04/29 12:07, , 113F
亞輪也是說可能造成地震好嗎
04/29 12:07, 113F
噓
04/29 12:32, , 114F
這一周的雨剛好把之前的擠下去阿
04/29 12:32, 114F
推
04/29 12:55, , 115F
原po這麼認真 結果底下都在反串XDDD 幫補
04/29 12:55, 115F
推
04/29 14:09, , 116F
其實他當初沒強調馬上 所以他還有機會凹講的是這因果關係
04/29 14:09, 116F
推
04/29 15:44, , 117F
媽的外國學者抄我們炎神的言論 抄襲還有臉自稱學者
04/29 15:44, 117F
推
04/29 16:14, , 118F
認真推
04/29 16:14, 118F
推
04/29 16:16, , 119F
反串很多，炎教授你敢嘴
04/29 16:16, 119F
噓
04/29 16:26, , 120F
炎教授就是深入淺出直接講結論
04/29 16:26, 120F
噓
04/29 16:44, , 121F
終於知道為何5566會從反串到爆紅了，反串都一堆人當真
04/29 16:44, 121F
推
04/29 17:04, , 122F
下雨會影響沒錯啊
04/29 17:04, 122F
推
04/29 17:12, , 123F
笑死 一堆白癡連內文都看不懂就在那邊我錯了
04/29 17:12, 123F
噓
04/30 10:08, , 124F
敢質疑炎教授，你這酸民還想被打臉? 看我教訓你你你
04/30 10:08, 124F
‣ 更多 popgsct 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1N8iHv4s (Gossiping)
‣ 更多 popgsct 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1N8iHv4s (Gossiping)