[問卦] 將一干人打為媚日皇民的背後意圖是?消失
各位大大安安,我想大家都有這種感覺,就是網路上喜歡到處亂版跳針的留言越來越多(
例如早期的yahoo新聞開始,到近期以免洗fb帳號到處到各新聞留言版),而留言內容其政
治傾向又很一致的,不外乎是反太陽花,反綠營,反台獨,反傾日。當然很多人都將這群
人歸類於五毛黨,用意在與對台政治作戰,挑起族群對立,分化台灣內部團結。但那種跳
針式不理性留言,非但不會使台灣人民對中共政體心生好感,反而會是反宣傳,你罵我是
皇民?好呀,我就當皇民給你看!這樣的政治宣傳完全是零績效,13億人口的政戰精英真
有這麼呆嗎?我好納悶。
想請教各位睿智的鄉民大大,這其中是不是有什麼八卦?
--
posted from bbs reader hybrid on my Sony C6602
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 125.230.39.166
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1460883541.A.3C9.html
推
04/17 16:59, , 1F
04/17 16:59, 1F
→
04/17 16:59, , 2F
04/17 16:59, 2F
推
04/17 16:59, , 3F
04/17 16:59, 3F
→
04/17 17:00, , 4F
04/17 17:00, 4F
推
04/17 17:01, , 5F
04/17 17:01, 5F
推
04/17 17:01, , 6F
04/17 17:01, 6F
→
04/17 17:01, , 7F
04/17 17:01, 7F
→
04/17 17:01, , 8F
04/17 17:01, 8F
推
04/17 17:01, , 9F
04/17 17:01, 9F
推
04/17 17:01, , 10F
04/17 17:01, 10F
推
04/17 17:01, , 11F
04/17 17:01, 11F
推
04/17 17:01, , 12F
04/17 17:01, 12F
推
04/17 17:02, , 13F
04/17 17:02, 13F
推
04/17 17:02, , 14F
04/17 17:02, 14F
推
04/17 17:03, , 15F
04/17 17:03, 15F
推
04/17 17:03, , 16F
04/17 17:03, 16F
→
04/17 17:03, , 17F
04/17 17:03, 17F
→
04/17 17:04, , 18F
04/17 17:04, 18F
推
04/17 17:05, , 19F
04/17 17:05, 19F
→
04/17 17:05, , 20F
04/17 17:05, 20F
還有 121 則推文
還有 119 段內文
→
04/17 20:33, , 142F
04/17 20:33, 142F
→
04/17 20:33, , 143F
04/17 20:33, 143F
→
04/17 20:36, , 144F
04/17 20:36, 144F
→
04/17 20:36, , 145F
04/17 20:36, 145F
→
04/17 20:36, , 146F
04/17 20:36, 146F
→
04/17 20:36, , 147F
04/17 20:36, 147F
→
04/17 20:37, , 148F
04/17 20:37, 148F
推
04/17 20:49, , 149F
04/17 20:49, 149F
→
04/17 20:49, , 150F
04/17 20:49, 150F
→
04/17 20:49, , 151F
04/17 20:49, 151F
→
04/17 20:49, , 152F
04/17 20:49, 152F
→
04/17 20:50, , 153F
04/17 20:50, 153F
→
04/17 20:50, , 154F
04/17 20:50, 154F
→
04/17 20:50, , 155F
04/17 20:50, 155F
→
04/17 20:50, , 156F
04/17 20:50, 156F
→
04/17 20:50, , 157F
04/17 20:50, 157F
推
04/18 01:16, , 158F
04/18 01:16, 158F
推
04/18 05:02, , 159F
04/18 05:02, 159F
噓
04/18 11:46, , 160F
04/18 11:46, 160F
推
04/18 19:34, , 161F
04/18 19:34, 161F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):