[問卦] 為什麼物理系不學固體力學?消失
固體力學是一門博大精深的學問
研究固力的物理學大師之多也不在話下
Hooke, Euler, Bernoulli, Timoshenko, ......
可是為什麼固體力學的相關課程,如材力、彈力、波動等
學的人幾乎都是機械系土木系而不是物理系
超怪的
固體力學難道不是物理嗎???
跟別人說你讀物理系結果推不出聲速在各物體間的變化
不覺得該躲到牆角反省嗎!!!
有沒有為什麼物理系不學固體力學的八卦?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.112.77.55
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1453822134.A.153.html
→
01/26 23:29, , 1F
01/26 23:29, 1F
噓
01/26 23:29, , 2F
01/26 23:29, 2F
推
01/26 23:29, , 3F
01/26 23:29, 3F
推
01/26 23:29, , 4F
01/26 23:29, 4F
→
01/26 23:30, , 5F
01/26 23:30, 5F
推
01/26 23:30, , 6F
01/26 23:30, 6F
→
01/26 23:30, , 7F
01/26 23:30, 7F
→
01/26 23:30, , 8F
01/26 23:30, 8F
→
01/26 23:31, , 9F
01/26 23:31, 9F
→
01/26 23:31, , 10F
01/26 23:31, 10F
應用面很廣不代表不基本啊,固體力學有很深的理論背景
推
01/26 23:32, , 11F
01/26 23:32, 11F
→
01/26 23:32, , 12F
01/26 23:32, 12F
→
01/26 23:32, , 13F
01/26 23:32, 13F
推
01/26 23:32, , 14F
01/26 23:32, 14F
噓
01/26 23:33, , 15F
01/26 23:33, 15F
推
01/26 23:35, , 16F
01/26 23:35, 16F
推
01/26 23:36, , 17F
01/26 23:36, 17F
推
01/26 23:36, , 18F
01/26 23:36, 18F
說真的,固體力學也偏重理論解析,不是工程應用
→
01/26 23:36, , 19F
01/26 23:36, 19F
推
01/26 23:37, , 20F
01/26 23:37, 20F
→
01/26 23:38, , 21F
01/26 23:38, 21F
噓
01/26 23:40, , 22F
01/26 23:40, 22F
→
01/26 23:41, , 23F
01/26 23:41, 23F
推
01/26 23:44, , 24F
01/26 23:44, 24F
推
01/26 23:44, , 25F
01/26 23:44, 25F
噓
01/26 23:47, , 26F
01/26 23:47, 26F
→
01/26 23:48, , 27F
01/26 23:48, 27F
有ㄇ 音速跟材料選擇有關 古力不可能摸到吧
或者一切都視為剛體的話音速就變無限大了
※ 編輯: gj942l41l4 (140.112.77.55), 01/26/2016 23:54:40
推
01/26 23:56, , 28F
01/26 23:56, 28F
→
01/26 23:58, , 29F
01/26 23:58, 29F
→
01/26 23:58, , 30F
01/26 23:58, 30F
→
01/27 00:01, , 31F
01/27 00:01, 31F
→
01/27 00:01, , 32F
01/27 00:01, 32F
推
01/27 00:30, , 33F
01/27 00:30, 33F
→
01/27 00:32, , 34F
01/27 00:32, 34F
→
01/27 00:33, , 35F
01/27 00:33, 35F
→
01/27 00:35, , 36F
01/27 00:35, 36F
推
01/27 00:44, , 37F
01/27 00:44, 37F
推
01/27 06:30, , 38F
01/27 06:30, 38F
→
01/27 06:33, , 39F
01/27 06:33, 39F
噓
01/27 07:36, , 40F
01/27 07:36, 40F
討論串 (同標題文章)