[心得]夠了吧
一直討論阿妹多強多強到底是要證明什麼?
新聞上明明就是寫的是
"評審團總召劉亞文說明評審結果,蔡依林贏在「全方位」,
唱作俱佳,舞蹈和音樂獲肯定,「以前是藝人,現在是演唱人」,
經過三輪投票後勝出。她的最大勁敵是戴佩妮"(引自聯合新聞網)
http://udn.com/NEWS/ENTERTAINMENT/ENTS1/3891604.shtml
也就是說,縱使蔡依林沒有資格得獎的話,那就會是戴佩妮,也不會是阿妹!!
所以不高興的話可以寫信去跟評審抗議,去新聞局舉牌,去連署罷免女歌手得主
提起確認當選無效之訴(反正現在很流行)
這種獎是蔡依林說要得就可以得的嗎
在這邊一直戰戰戰,是要幹麼?
我知道阿妹很強,大概全台灣都知道,那所以怎樣?
王建民每場都勝投嗎?邦茲每次都全壘打?
很強所以不會輸,誰規定的?
還有阿,儘管阿妹在台上頒獎的時候那種落寞不甘心盡顯無遺(我也不覺得多有風度)
但是她終究都已經去恭喜蔡依林了, 將來也是同一個公司的同事,
那剩下你們在那邊不甘心不放手是要幹麼?
阿妹本身的條件好,又加入這麻喜歡炒作新聞又強勢的公司,
下一張唱片一定會是很精美的製作,
憑她的實力,絕對會再捲土重來,如願以償
讓蔡依林得一下獎,開心一下,到底哪裡礙著你們了!?
她醜,她歌聲有侷限性,
可是她都已經到非得要去變臉才有資格走"所謂性感"路線的可悲處境
非得要甩猴戲一樣在地上滾來滾去才能讓大家注意她的唱片,
可以的話卑微的希望能順便注意到她的歌聲
不像阿妹,就算不唱歌,站在那邊大家都會稱讚她很會唱歌!
你們說後天的加工是不公平的,那在面對先天不平等,天賦的不同,難道就是公平嗎?
所以天資不如人的,苦苦追趕,學習,是永遠不可能勝過有天賦的人嗎?
況且,歌唱的評斷本來就很主觀,
就算得了女歌手,也不妨礙阿妹在歌壇的地位,應該說根本亦無勝敗可言!
你們又何必大加撻伐,煩了自己也傷了別人
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.230.106.250
推
06/18 03:36, , 1F
06/18 03:36, 1F
推
06/18 03:36, , 2F
06/18 03:36, 2F
推
06/18 03:36, , 3F
06/18 03:36, 3F
→
06/18 03:37, , 4F
06/18 03:37, 4F
→
06/18 03:37, , 5F
06/18 03:37, 5F
→
06/18 03:37, , 6F
06/18 03:37, 6F
推
06/18 03:37, , 7F
06/18 03:37, 7F
→
06/18 03:38, , 8F
06/18 03:38, 8F
推
06/18 03:39, , 9F
06/18 03:39, 9F
推
06/18 03:40, , 10F
06/18 03:40, 10F
推
06/18 03:42, , 11F
06/18 03:42, 11F
推
06/18 03:53, , 12F
06/18 03:53, 12F
推
06/18 03:57, , 13F
06/18 03:57, 13F
→
06/18 03:58, , 14F
06/18 03:58, 14F
推
06/18 04:04, , 15F
06/18 04:04, 15F
推
06/18 04:05, , 16F
06/18 04:05, 16F
推
06/18 04:05, , 17F
06/18 04:05, 17F
→
06/18 04:06, , 18F
06/18 04:06, 18F
→
06/18 04:06, , 19F
06/18 04:06, 19F
推
06/18 04:28, , 20F
06/18 04:28, 20F
→
06/18 04:29, , 21F
06/18 04:29, 21F
推
06/18 04:53, , 22F
06/18 04:53, 22F
→
06/18 05:10, , 23F
06/18 05:10, 23F
→
06/18 05:11, , 24F
06/18 05:11, 24F
→
06/18 05:11, , 25F
06/18 05:11, 25F
→
06/18 05:22, , 26F
06/18 05:22, 26F
→
06/18 05:23, , 27F
06/18 05:23, 27F
→
06/18 05:23, , 28F
06/18 05:23, 28F
→
06/18 05:24, , 29F
06/18 05:24, 29F
→
06/18 05:25, , 30F
06/18 05:25, 30F
→
06/18 05:25, , 31F
06/18 05:25, 31F
→
06/18 05:26, , 32F
06/18 05:26, 32F
→
06/18 05:26, , 33F
06/18 05:26, 33F
→
06/18 05:27, , 34F
06/18 05:27, 34F
推
06/18 05:28, , 35F
06/18 05:28, 35F
→
06/18 05:29, , 36F
06/18 05:29, 36F
→
06/18 05:30, , 37F
06/18 05:30, 37F
→
06/18 05:31, , 38F
06/18 05:31, 38F
→
06/18 05:31, , 39F
06/18 05:31, 39F
→
06/18 05:32, , 40F
06/18 05:32, 40F
→
06/18 05:33, , 41F
06/18 05:33, 41F
推
06/18 05:37, , 42F
06/18 05:37, 42F
推
06/18 05:40, , 43F
06/18 05:40, 43F
→
06/18 05:40, , 44F
06/18 05:40, 44F
→
06/18 05:41, , 45F
06/18 05:41, 45F
推
06/18 05:42, , 46F
06/18 05:42, 46F
→
06/18 05:43, , 47F
06/18 05:43, 47F
→
06/18 05:43, , 48F
06/18 05:43, 48F
推
06/18 07:23, , 49F
06/18 07:23, 49F
→
06/18 07:23, , 50F
06/18 07:23, 50F
推
06/18 07:45, , 51F
06/18 07:45, 51F
→
06/18 07:46, , 52F
06/18 07:46, 52F
→
06/18 07:46, , 53F
06/18 07:46, 53F
推
06/18 07:59, , 54F
06/18 07:59, 54F
→
06/18 08:00, , 55F
06/18 08:00, 55F
推
06/18 09:04, , 56F
06/18 09:04, 56F
→
06/18 09:05, , 57F
06/18 09:05, 57F
推
06/18 12:24, , 58F
06/18 12:24, 58F
→
06/18 12:24, , 59F
06/18 12:24, 59F
→
06/18 12:25, , 60F
06/18 12:25, 60F
→
06/18 12:26, , 61F
06/18 12:26, 61F
推
06/18 12:45, , 62F
06/18 12:45, 62F
推
06/18 12:49, , 63F
06/18 12:49, 63F
推
06/18 12:55, , 64F
06/18 12:55, 64F
推
06/18 13:02, , 65F
06/18 13:02, 65F
→
06/18 13:03, , 66F
06/18 13:03, 66F
→
06/18 13:03, , 67F
06/18 13:03, 67F
推
06/18 14:33, , 68F
06/18 14:33, 68F
推
06/18 14:58, , 69F
06/18 14:58, 69F
推
06/18 15:13, , 70F
06/18 15:13, 70F
→
06/18 15:13, , 71F
06/18 15:13, 71F
推
06/18 15:24, , 72F
06/18 15:24, 72F
推
06/18 15:27, , 73F
06/18 15:27, 73F
→
06/18 15:28, , 74F
06/18 15:28, 74F
推
06/18 17:26, , 75F
06/18 17:26, 75F
推
06/19 00:45, , 76F
06/19 00:45, 76F
→
06/19 00:45, , 77F
06/19 00:45, 77F
推
06/19 00:48, , 78F
06/19 00:48, 78F
→
06/19 00:48, , 79F
06/19 00:48, 79F
→
06/19 00:49, , 80F
06/19 00:49, 80F
→
06/19 00:49, , 81F
06/19 00:49, 81F
推
06/20 00:03, , 82F
06/20 00:03, 82F
推
06/20 15:36, , 83F
06/20 15:36, 83F
→
06/27 03:03, , 84F
06/27 03:03, 84F
討論串 (同標題文章)