[問題] argument問題
寫的是這題高頻
The following appeared as an editorial in a wildlife journal.
"Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic region.
They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the
course of a year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain
the plants on which they feed, and cold enough, at least some of the year,
for the ice to cover the sea separating the islands, allowing the deer to
travel over it. Unfortunately, according to reports from local hunters, the
deer populations are declining. Since these reports coincide with
recent global warming trends that have caused the sea ice to melt,
we can conclude that the decline in arctic deer populations is the result
of deer being unable to follow their age-old migration patterns across the
frozen sea."
我提出的三個問題是
1.獵人所做的調查是否夠專業
調查的樣本數是否足夠
2.調查所知的北極鹿減少是否為真
或許是鹿群遷移到較高緯度所沒調查到的地方
3.造成鹿群減少的原因是否真的只有結論這理由
我拿去給補習班老師批改
老師認為第一項跟第二項我所提出的是題目給的資料 不可拒絕
所以認為前兩點的理由不足
而第三點是可以的
想請問一下大家 碰到這題大家會挑哪些點攻擊
謝謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.254.197.20
推
05/03 01:14, , 1F
05/03 01:14, 1F
→
05/03 01:14, , 2F
05/03 01:14, 2F
→
05/03 01:16, , 3F
05/03 01:16, 3F
→
05/03 01:16, , 4F
05/03 01:16, 4F
推
05/03 01:21, , 5F
05/03 01:21, 5F
→
05/03 01:22, , 6F
05/03 01:22, 6F
推
05/03 14:45, , 7F
05/03 14:45, 7F
→
05/03 14:45, , 8F
05/03 14:45, 8F
推
05/03 19:02, , 9F
05/03 19:02, 9F
→
05/03 19:02, , 10F
05/03 19:02, 10F
推
05/17 20:02, , 11F
05/17 20:02, 11F
討論串 (同標題文章)