[問題] SC OG12-79

看板GMAT作者 (小比)時間9年前 (2015/05/06 23:39), 編輯推噓1(103)
留言4則, 1人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions. 正確選項 (B)if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food, 其中OG解釋in attributing 會修飾到prepetrators,而照理說要修到attorneys才對 可是我有點不太懂OG所說的修飾對象的問題,麻煩高手們指點迷津,謝謝~ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.42.19.126 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/GMAT/M.1430926751.A.F8A.html

05/06 23:51, , 1F
attribute的動作發出者應為attorneys, 非perpetrators
05/06 23:51, 1F

05/06 23:52, , 2F
原句中in attributing的分詞結構被連接詞but阻隔,只能
05/06 23:52, 2F

05/06 23:53, , 3F
向後修飾到第二個子句的主詞perpetrators, 在句意上的
05/06 23:53, 3F

05/06 23:54, , 4F
修飾關係錯誤.
05/06 23:54, 4F
文章代碼(AID): #1LIZMV-A (GMAT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1LIZMV-A (GMAT)