※ 引述《StraySheep (A.K.A. The Lost Sheep)》之銘言：
: 132
: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average of 419
: times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in
: 1980.
: (A) that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar
: workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times
: (B) that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar
: workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times
: (C) that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar
: workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
: (D) CEO's who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar
: workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
: (E) CEO's now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers,
: compared to the ratio of 42 times
: 答案是(C), 小弟我看了 Chase Dream 也看了 Manhattan GMAT Forums
: 原因和文法大致理解了.
: 但因為小弟程度頗差, 考試時總是很難了解句意, 所以還是來請教各位前輩,
: 請大家為我釐清一些考試技巧上的問題
: (1) 我忘記在哪裡曾聽說過, 考試技巧 as compared to 必錯.
: 但這題似乎破功.
: 可是 as compared to 是不是依然很常被編成錯誤答案選項?
: 我模考最後都寫不完,最後幾題如果看到有 as compared to 的選項,是不是就不要選了?
: (如果正確答案真的是有as compared to 的, 也只好欣然接受)
: (2) as compared to 是什麼意思呢? compared to 不是比喻的意思嗎?
我比較想知道說
如果 正確選項 (C) 中的 as compared to 的 "as" 被拿掉後
那這個選項還對嗎???
這樣是不是變成 "compared to ..." 這個分詞構句
在修飾 CEO's , 造成語意錯誤了呢??
--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 211.21.104.32
※ 編輯: Bwk 來自: 211.21.104.32 (08/31 14:46)
推
08/31 22:00, , 1F
08/31 22:00, 1F
→
09/03 01:17, , 2F
09/03 01:17, 2F
→
09/03 01:22, , 3F
09/03 01:22, 3F
→
09/03 02:01, , 4F
09/03 02:01, 4F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 4 篇)：