Re: [語文] GWD-1-16

看板GMAT作者 (pentimento)時間14年前 (2009/12/01 09:14), 編輯推噓3(3016)
留言19則, 5人參與, 5年前最新討論串3/3 (看更多)
※ 引述《tootoobenee (A級垂耳兔)》之銘言: : ※ 引述《glendy (glendy)》之銘言: : : 第16題 : : Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending : : in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it : : ---------------------------- : : was in any previous election. : : --- : : 答案是B: : : a greater proportion than : : 但我選C: : : a greater proportion than they have been : : 是否they have been是多餘的字眼?或有其他原因? : 這題是走同位語的獨立主格結構, 還原句為 : a proportion (that was) greater that it was in any previous election : a proportion是以同位語方式修飾half of the spending : 省略後因為be動詞that was的was消失了,所以後面than的主詞及be動詞也跟著省略 : 這樣比較結構才會平衡 : 一點淺見... 【原題照引】第16題 Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it ---------------------------- was in any previous election. --- 答案是B:a greater proportion than 【解法】 一、這題的語意乃「此比例 (more than half) 比原本之前的任何一次選舉的比 例都高」。所以這句話在完整情況下可以寫成: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, which is a greater proportion than it was in any previous election. 二、1992 之後的 which is 可以省略,而使得 a greater... 成為同位語。這 應該不用解釋吧! 三、根據文法規定, than 之後的省略情況有一條規則: 「若主要子句與從屬子句的時態不同時,不能省略動詞(或助動詞),但若 有『表示時間的字』時,就可以省略。」 例如: It is warmer today than (it was) yesterday. 故原題中 than 之後的部分,因為有表時間的字 (in any previous election),故可以將 it was 省略。 四、如此便得到原題答案 (B) 的 a greater proportion than in any previous election. 供參考 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.23.25

12/01 10:54, , 1F
受教了! 時間因素很久以前有讀過,謝謝提醒!
12/01 10:54, 1F

12/01 21:38, , 2F
一點個人淺見~ 這題應該是兔大的同位語解釋沒錯~
12/01 21:38, 2F

12/01 21:39, , 3F
,which 指代對象不明確 主詞應該是要指代COSTS吧~
12/01 21:39, 3F

12/01 21:40, , 4F
但是你用,which 無法跳過動詞指代前面的COSTS
12/01 21:40, 4F

12/01 21:41, , 5F
個人淺見~~希望說錯能多多指教才有進步~~謝謝!!!
12/01 21:41, 5F

12/01 21:43, , 6F
對了~~而且這題是脫節結構~,後面應該要直接加主詞要不然
12/01 21:43, 6F

12/01 21:43, , 7F
讀者會混淆~不知道題目的主詞到底是誰!!!
12/01 21:43, 7F

12/01 21:45, , 8F
說錯請指正一下感恩~!!!
12/01 21:45, 8F

12/01 22:27, , 9F
同意樓上解釋 還有一點it was姐是有漏洞 若如上述解釋
12/01 22:27, 9F

12/01 22:28, , 10F
it was可以省略 那A基本上也沒錯 邏輯上就有問題 基本
12/01 22:28, 10F

12/01 22:31, , 11F
上it在這應該指代有誤吧 以前的比例與現在的比例作比較
12/01 22:31, 11F

12/01 23:56, , 12F
回m大,這裡which 是指 (more than half),不指 cost,
12/01 23:56, 12F

12/01 23:58, , 13F
另外,which 只有跳過介片,沒有跳過動詞。而根據T大
12/01 23:58, 13F

12/01 23:58, , 14F
的解法,出來的字序是 a proportion greater,而非
12/01 23:58, 14F

12/01 23:59, , 15F
答案的 a greater proportion,請參考。
12/01 23:59, 15F

12/02 00:01, , 16F
回d大,你講的it有道理,這我也想過,應該是用 that,
12/02 00:01, 16F

12/02 00:03, , 17F
我原來po文想偷懶,不去說明這段。既然被指出,就只能
12/02 00:03, 17F

12/02 00:28, , 18F
就教各方高人,請問如何解釋?
12/02 00:28, 18F

12/02 18:45, 5年前 , 19F
it was可以省略 https://noxiv.com
12/02 18:45, 19F
文章代碼(AID): #1B56tQIV (GMAT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1B56tQIV (GMAT)