[心得] 林飛帆是個失敗的領導!
從活動剛開始到現在,我感覺到林飛帆的領導能力的缺失越來越明顯。
剛開始出奇不意的率眾站領立法院,確實是相當成功的行動策劃。
但是在訴求、作為、謀略方面,林飛帆是徹底的失敗。
一開始的主張「反黑箱」「要求逐條審查」的要求,
國民黨很快便已答應讓步,林飛帆發覺沒了施力點,立刻見風轉舵、得寸進尺,
改口要「退回服貿」、「兩岸監督條例立法」、「成力公民憲政聯盟」等等...
這種仗恃民粹、立場飄忽、非鬧不可的心態,其實與一般政客無異。
國民黨當然不可能跟這樣沒有誠信基礎的對象談判。
鷹派人士要出入立法院議場的那天,林飛帆更是完全無法有效領導學生群眾。
任憑他們鼓譟,他卻只能說:「如果你們能承擔這樣的刑責,你們就去吧」
學生們脫隊非法佔領行政院,被武力驅離打得滿身血的時候,大家譴責警察與馬江,
卻沒有想過:掌控不了局面的林飛帆躲在立院,不敢出身掌控局面,
縱任激進學生進入行政院肆亂破壞妄為,才是更根本的罪人?
這些學生流血流淚,卻成就了林飛帆這個龜縮膽小鬼的悲劇形像。
又說到他與馬江的對話,則根本是完全的無理野蠻人,當天立院議場外與江宜樺對話時,
他沒種扮黑臉,屢次教旁邊的律師鼓譟打斷江宜樺的談話,
毫無實質的辯證論理,只想賣弄小聰明,用民粹為自己的聲望助威。
馬英九願意不設任何立場與前提邀他對談,他卻又怯戰不敢上場。
現在330遊行幾乎是他的最後一著了,因為國民黨已經摸透了林飛帆這個人,
他就是個有小聰明,沒大智慧、大勇氣,只想利用學生謀取個人聲望的投機主義者。
一連串反整他的招數將會越來越多、越有效。
他未來會是個成功的政客,但在成為政客之前,
會因為這次行動被國民黨關個幾年吧..但這也是應該的!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.237.119.176
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/FuMouDiscuss/M.1396070356.A.7C8.html
→
03/29 13:19, , 1F
03/29 13:19, 1F
噓
03/29 13:19, , 2F
03/29 13:19, 2F
→
03/29 13:19, , 3F
03/29 13:19, 3F
噓
03/29 13:20, , 4F
03/29 13:20, 4F
推
03/29 13:20, , 5F
03/29 13:20, 5F
→
03/29 13:20, , 6F
03/29 13:20, 6F
噓
03/29 13:20, , 7F
03/29 13:20, 7F
噓
03/29 13:20, , 8F
03/29 13:20, 8F
噓
03/29 13:20, , 9F
03/29 13:20, 9F
→
03/29 13:20, , 10F
03/29 13:20, 10F
噓
03/29 13:20, , 11F
03/29 13:20, 11F
→
03/29 13:20, , 12F
03/29 13:20, 12F
噓
03/29 13:20, , 13F
03/29 13:20, 13F
噓
03/29 13:20, , 14F
03/29 13:20, 14F
噓
03/29 13:21, , 15F
03/29 13:21, 15F
→
03/29 13:21, , 16F
03/29 13:21, 16F
噓
03/29 13:21, , 17F
03/29 13:21, 17F
噓
03/29 13:21, , 18F
03/29 13:21, 18F
噓
03/29 13:21, , 19F
03/29 13:21, 19F
噓
03/29 13:22, , 20F
03/29 13:22, 20F
推
03/29 13:22, , 21F
03/29 13:22, 21F
噓
03/29 13:22, , 22F
03/29 13:22, 22F
→
03/29 13:22, , 23F
03/29 13:22, 23F
噓
03/29 13:22, , 24F
03/29 13:22, 24F
噓
03/29 13:23, , 25F
03/29 13:23, 25F
→
03/29 13:23, , 26F
03/29 13:23, 26F
推
03/29 13:23, , 27F
03/29 13:23, 27F
推
03/29 13:23, , 28F
03/29 13:23, 28F
噓
03/29 13:23, , 29F
03/29 13:23, 29F
噓
03/29 13:23, , 30F
03/29 13:23, 30F
噓
03/29 13:23, , 31F
03/29 13:23, 31F
噓
03/29 13:23, , 32F
03/29 13:23, 32F
→
03/29 13:23, , 33F
03/29 13:23, 33F
噓
03/29 13:24, , 34F
03/29 13:24, 34F
噓
03/29 13:24, , 35F
03/29 13:24, 35F
推
03/29 13:24, , 36F
03/29 13:24, 36F
噓
03/29 13:25, , 37F
03/29 13:25, 37F
→
03/29 13:25, , 38F
03/29 13:25, 38F
噓
03/29 13:25, , 39F
03/29 13:25, 39F
還有 26 則推文
噓
03/29 13:39, , 66F
03/29 13:39, 66F
→
03/29 13:40, , 67F
03/29 13:40, 67F
噓
03/29 13:40, , 68F
03/29 13:40, 68F
→
03/29 13:41, , 69F
03/29 13:41, 69F
噓
03/29 13:41, , 70F
03/29 13:41, 70F
→
03/29 13:42, , 71F
03/29 13:42, 71F
→
03/29 13:43, , 72F
03/29 13:43, 72F
推
03/29 13:43, , 73F
03/29 13:43, 73F
→
03/29 13:43, , 74F
03/29 13:43, 74F
→
03/29 13:44, , 75F
03/29 13:44, 75F
→
03/29 13:45, , 76F
03/29 13:45, 76F
噓
03/29 13:45, , 77F
03/29 13:45, 77F
噓
03/29 13:45, , 78F
03/29 13:45, 78F
噓
03/29 13:46, , 79F
03/29 13:46, 79F
推
03/29 13:48, , 80F
03/29 13:48, 80F
推
03/29 13:49, , 81F
03/29 13:49, 81F
噓
03/29 13:49, , 82F
03/29 13:49, 82F
噓
03/29 13:52, , 83F
03/29 13:52, 83F
→
03/29 13:58, , 84F
03/29 13:58, 84F
噓
03/29 13:59, , 85F
03/29 13:59, 85F
推
03/29 14:13, , 86F
03/29 14:13, 86F
→
03/29 14:13, , 87F
03/29 14:13, 87F
→
03/29 14:14, , 88F
03/29 14:14, 88F
→
03/29 14:15, , 89F
03/29 14:15, 89F
噓
03/29 14:21, , 90F
03/29 14:21, 90F
噓
03/29 14:22, , 91F
03/29 14:22, 91F
推
03/29 14:32, , 92F
03/29 14:32, 92F
→
03/29 14:32, , 93F
03/29 14:32, 93F
噓
03/29 14:40, , 94F
03/29 14:40, 94F
噓
03/29 14:42, , 95F
03/29 14:42, 95F
噓
03/29 14:49, , 96F
03/29 14:49, 96F
噓
03/29 14:50, , 97F
03/29 14:50, 97F
噓
03/29 14:51, , 98F
03/29 14:51, 98F
噓
03/29 15:01, , 99F
03/29 15:01, 99F
噓
03/29 15:06, , 100F
03/29 15:06, 100F
推
03/29 15:56, , 101F
03/29 15:56, 101F
噓
03/29 15:58, , 102F
03/29 15:58, 102F
噓
03/29 16:04, , 103F
03/29 16:04, 103F
噓
03/29 16:41, , 104F
03/29 16:41, 104F
推
03/29 18:58, , 105F
03/29 18:58, 105F
討論串 (同標題文章)