[問題] 緹歐的戰技是以ATS為攻擊判定嗎?
雖然魔王版已經入手很久了,
但是一直都沒有什麼時間翻攻略。
印象中緹歐的攻擊和聯合攻擊是以STR為判定,
然後以對方的ADF來算防禦。
攻略的23頁上面也是這樣寫的。
但是當我翻到
第35頁,緹歐的介紹那邊的時候,
下面寫的是以攻擊方ATS為基準,防禦方ADF為基準。
這是……
1. 攻略35頁那邊寫錯了,不是ATS是STR
2. 普通攻擊、聯合攻擊是看STR。普通戰技、聯合戰技是看ATS
是哪個勒?@@
有人知道嗎?@@
--
就算手裡握著劍,我也無法保護你;
就算手裡沒有劍,我也無法擁抱你。
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
現實,說不定才是像夢一般空虛的東西,
而夢,反而才是最真實的。
A1pha
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.57.132.37
→
09/23 05:58, , 1F
09/23 05:58, 1F
→
09/23 05:58, , 2F
09/23 05:58, 2F
→
09/23 05:59, , 3F
09/23 05:59, 3F
→
09/23 07:04, , 4F
09/23 07:04, 4F
→
09/23 07:06, , 5F
09/23 07:06, 5F
→
09/23 07:07, , 6F
09/23 07:07, 6F
→
09/23 07:10, , 7F
09/23 07:10, 7F
推
09/23 08:07, , 8F
09/23 08:07, 8F
→
09/23 08:10, , 9F
09/23 08:10, 9F
→
09/23 08:10, , 10F
09/23 08:10, 10F
→
09/23 08:11, , 11F
09/23 08:11, 11F
→
09/23 08:12, , 12F
09/23 08:12, 12F
→
09/23 08:14, , 13F
09/23 08:14, 13F
推
09/23 09:18, , 14F
09/23 09:18, 14F
→
09/23 09:19, , 15F
09/23 09:19, 15F
→
09/23 09:27, , 16F
09/23 09:27, 16F
推
09/23 10:07, , 17F
09/23 10:07, 17F
推
09/23 10:24, , 18F
09/23 10:24, 18F
推
09/23 10:28, , 19F
09/23 10:28, 19F
→
09/23 10:54, , 20F
09/23 10:54, 20F
→
09/23 10:55, , 21F
09/23 10:55, 21F
→
09/23 11:01, , 22F
09/23 11:01, 22F
→
09/23 11:02, , 23F
09/23 11:02, 23F
推
09/23 12:34, , 24F
09/23 12:34, 24F
推
09/23 12:38, , 25F
09/23 12:38, 25F
→
09/23 12:39, , 26F
09/23 12:39, 26F
→
09/23 12:39, , 27F
09/23 12:39, 27F
推
09/23 12:44, , 28F
09/23 12:44, 28F
→
09/23 12:44, , 29F
09/23 12:44, 29F
推
09/23 13:27, , 30F
09/23 13:27, 30F
→
09/23 13:28, , 31F
09/23 13:28, 31F
→
09/23 13:29, , 32F
09/23 13:29, 32F
→
09/23 14:10, , 33F
09/23 14:10, 33F
推
09/23 14:30, , 34F
09/23 14:30, 34F
疑,緹歐的普攻,AT獎勵中+STR無效但是+ATS有效嗎?@@
雖然我知道緹歐攻擊是魔法屬性,
但也太奇怪了……
因為測試的時候,緹歐普攻的確是依照STR在變化的@@
我把武器拔下來打,普攻打66點血,裝上武器打三百左右。(ATS不變)
然後測試緹歐的戰技,武器拔下來、裝上去,戰技都打300多,
也就是說戰技的確是看ATS,不看STR。
好混亂啊 囧
※ 編輯: A1pha 來自: 61.57.132.37 (09/23 15:32)
推
09/23 17:08, , 35F
09/23 17:08, 35F
→
09/23 17:08, , 36F
09/23 17:08, 36F
→
09/23 17:09, , 37F
09/23 17:09, 37F
→
09/23 17:10, , 38F
09/23 17:10, 38F
→
09/23 17:10, , 39F
09/23 17:10, 39F
→
09/23 17:13, , 40F
09/23 17:13, 40F
→
09/23 17:14, , 41F
09/23 17:14, 41F
→
09/23 17:14, , 42F
09/23 17:14, 42F
→
09/23 17:14, , 43F
09/23 17:14, 43F
→
09/23 17:15, , 44F
09/23 17:15, 44F
推
09/23 18:45, , 45F
09/23 18:45, 45F
→
09/23 18:46, , 46F
09/23 18:46, 46F
→
09/24 10:44, , 47F
09/24 10:44, 47F
→
09/24 10:44, , 48F
09/24 10:44, 48F
推
09/24 11:39, , 49F
09/24 11:39, 49F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):