[問題] 毒樹果理論
以下內容來自於 http://tinyurl.com/65akbq
毒樹果實理論的核心內容在於:違法直接取得的證據為毒樹,基於該違法取得的證據再以
合法手段間接取得的其他證據(第二次證據或衍生證據),則如同從毒樹長出來的毒果,
亦不得使用。也就是第一違法取得的證據將會汙染基於此違法證據所合法取得的證據。
[編輯] 例外毒樹果實理論目前為止,發展出三種例外:
獨立來源(independent source)
必然發現(inevitable discovery)
稀釋原則(purged taint exception)
最近看電影聽到這個「毒樹果理論」,理論本身還蠻容易理解的,
不過 wiki 上沒有對這三種例外提出例子,只能就字面上來猜測,
有沒有法律高手可以用比較生活化的說法來解釋一下這三種例外呀?
--
如果今天沒人回的話,再轉到法律專板問問好了~
--
"If every basketball player worked as hard as me, I would be out of job."
- Steve Nash
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.37.145.221
推
07/09 15:49, , 1F
07/09 15:49, 1F
→
07/09 16:01, , 2F
07/09 16:01, 2F
推
07/09 16:30, , 3F
07/09 16:30, 3F
→
07/09 16:31, , 4F
07/09 16:31, 4F
→
07/09 16:33, , 5F
07/09 16:33, 5F
→
07/09 16:34, , 6F
07/09 16:34, 6F
→
07/09 16:35, , 7F
07/09 16:35, 7F
→
07/09 16:36, , 8F
07/09 16:36, 8F
→
07/09 16:38, , 9F
07/09 16:38, 9F
→
07/09 16:39, , 10F
07/09 16:39, 10F
→
07/09 16:42, , 11F
07/09 16:42, 11F
→
07/09 16:42, , 12F
07/09 16:42, 12F
推
07/09 16:56, , 13F
07/09 16:56, 13F
→
07/09 18:09, , 14F
07/09 18:09, 14F
推
07/09 18:42, , 15F
07/09 18:42, 15F
推
07/09 18:52, , 16F
07/09 18:52, 16F
推
07/09 19:15, , 17F
07/09 19:15, 17F
推
07/09 19:40, , 18F
07/09 19:40, 18F
推
07/09 22:04, , 19F
07/09 22:04, 19F
推
07/09 23:10, , 20F
07/09 23:10, 20F
推
07/10 01:08, , 21F
07/10 01:08, 21F
→
07/10 01:08, , 22F
07/10 01:08, 22F
推
07/10 04:07, , 23F
07/10 04:07, 23F
推
07/10 11:57, , 24F
07/10 11:57, 24F
推
07/10 12:20, , 25F
07/10 12:20, 25F
推
07/10 12:22, , 26F
07/10 12:22, 26F
推
07/10 12:30, , 27F
07/10 12:30, 27F
推
07/10 15:27, , 28F
07/10 15:27, 28F
推
07/10 15:29, , 29F
07/10 15:29, 29F
推
07/11 00:12, , 30F
07/11 00:12, 30F
推
07/11 10:36, , 31F
07/11 10:36, 31F
推
07/11 13:06, , 32F
07/11 13:06, 32F
推
07/11 13:26, , 33F
07/11 13:26, 33F
推
07/11 14:05, , 34F
07/11 14:05, 34F
推
07/11 17:08, , 35F
07/11 17:08, 35F
推
07/11 22:35, , 36F
07/11 22:35, 36F
推
07/12 01:29, , 37F
07/12 01:29, 37F
推
07/13 17:36, , 38F
07/13 17:36, 38F
→
08/10 21:24, , 39F
08/10 21:24, 39F
→
09/12 08:46, , 40F
09/12 08:46, 40F