Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream befor

看板FB_security作者時間13年前 (2012/07/09 05:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串11/18 (看更多)
On 2012.07.08. 1:17, Doug Barton wrote: > Other than authoritative DNS, what features does unbound lack that you want? [Picking up a random mail from the thread.] Other than the functionality, when we replace something, it is also important to do some benchmarks and assure that the performance is not reasonably worse. Some time back I committed the error of not carefully pass this requirement with BSD grep but so far it seems it went fine with the recent BSD sort change. It would be nice to also ensure this with the unbound change if it really happens. Gabor _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1F-VKEHe (FB_security)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 11 之 18 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1F-VKEHe (FB_security)