Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream befor
On 2012-07-07 16:45, Doug Barton wrote:
> Also re DNSSEC integration in the base, I've stated before that I
> believe very strongly that any kind of hard-coding of trust anchors as
> part of the base resolver setup is a bad idea, and should not be done.
> We need to leverage the ports system for this so that we don't get stuck
> with a scenario where we have stale stuff in the base that is hard for
> users to upgrade.
Considering the current root update cert bundle has a 20-year root CA
and 5-year DNSSEC and email CAs, I don't think it's unreasonable to
maintain a copy of icannbundle.pem in the source tree or simply rely on
the copy built into unbound-anchor.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 18 篇):