Re: periodic security run output gives false positives after 1 y

On 2012-02-19 08:50, Martin Sch羹tte wrote:
> On 17.02.2012 20:48, Roger Marquis wrote:
>> and difficult to change without breaking more than it fixes.  The current
>> syslog syntax timestamp has been reliable now for what, 25+ years?  I
>> don't personally see any measurable ROI from changing it.  YMMV of
>> course.
> 
> I really understand the concern, but some requirements do change over
> time. Staying at the lowest common denominator for 25+ years may
> indicate robustness, but it may also indicate obsolence.
> 

What seems obsolete is this thread.

Can you at least prepended [OT RANT] to the subject?

Some people monitor this list to be informed of possible FreeBSD security issues, of which this isn't.

Please, get a motel room or something...

johnea
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"