Re: Request for opinions - gvinum or ccd?

看板FB_hackers作者時間16年前 (2009/06/07 15:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串15/16 (看更多)
>> (very roughly, in the non-sequential access case) expected to deliver >> performance of four drives in a RAID0 array? > > According to all the Sun documentation, the I/O throughput of a raidz > configuration is equal to that of a single drive. exactly what i say. it's like RAID3. Not RAID5 which have close to n times single drive throughput on read and rougly n/4 on writes. > We remade the pool using 3x 8-drive raidz2 vdevs, and performance has > been great (400 MBytes/s write, almost 3 GBytes/s sequential read, 800 why write performance is so slow? in Sun theory it should have the same speed as reads. I would say that it should be even better a bit - filesystem get data first in cache and can plan ahead. > MBytes/s random read). random read on how big chunks? Are you sure you get 3GB/s on read? it would mean each drive must be able to do 140MB/s What disks do you use? _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1AAspo00 (FB_hackers)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1AAspo00 (FB_hackers)