Re: Request for opinions - gvinum or ccd?

看板FB_hackers作者時間16年前 (2009/06/01 11:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串13/16 (看更多)
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:59 PM, <xorquewasp@googlemail.com> wrote: > There is one last thing I'd like clarified. From the zpool > manpage: > > =C2=A0In order =C2=A0to take advantage of these features, a pool must mak= e use of > =C2=A0some form of redundancy, using either mirrored or raidz =C2=A0group= s. =C2=A0While > =C2=A0ZFS =C2=A0supports running in a non-redundant configuration, where = each root > =C2=A0vdev is simply a disk or file, this is strongly discouraged. =C2=A0= A =C2=A0single > =C2=A0case of bit corruption can render some or all of your data unavaila= ble. > > Is this supposed to mean: > > =C2=A0"ZFS is more fragile than most. If you don't use redundancy, one > =C2=A0 case of bit corruption will destroy the filesystem" > > Or: > > =C2=A0"Hard disks explode often. Use redundancy." Unless you specify mirror or raidz on the create/add line, zfs (in essence) creates a RAID0 stripe of all the vdevs. Hence, if a single drive dies, the whole thing dies. Just like in a normal hardware/software RAID0 array. Nothing special or new here. Just like "normal" RAID, unless you add redundancy (RAID1/5/6) to a stripe set, losing a single disk means losing the whole array. --=20 Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1A8qHm00 (FB_hackers)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1A8qHm00 (FB_hackers)