Re: ntpd replacement (Was: Re: Import of DragonFly Mail Agent)

看板FB_current作者時間12年前 (2014/02/25 02:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串7/7 (看更多)
On 24/02/2014 15:40, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <530B666A.1000800@rewt.org.uk>, Joe Holden writes: > >>> Please check how NTP is authenticated before giving bad advice, >>> it's all in the RFC. >>> >> v3 or v4? It is an optional part of the spec in both cases and again >> isn't required for 99% of people using ntpd as a client, which was the >> entire point of this exercise in the first place. > > Authentication of NTP is rapidly gaining focus these days, for obvious > reasons, so I think adopting software now which don't support it would > be needlessly shortsighted. > > 3 years ago I would have agree with you, but not now. > Fair enough, that isn't the real problem we are facing but rather than derail this thread even further I think it would be best to discuss that another day :) _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1J2uZVYy (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1J2uZVYy (FB_current)