Re: ntpd replacement (Was: Re: Import of DragonFly Mail Agent)

看板FB_current作者時間12年前 (2014/02/24 20:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串3/7 (看更多)
On 24/02/2014 11:18, Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Joe Holden on Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:13:23AM +0000: >> hm, I can't say I have noticed this as being a problem where I've >> used it, are there any scenarios where this is a showstopper? > > Non-support for auth is a concern, lack of NTPv4 protocol support is another. Base ntpd also include SNTP which is a lightweight NTPv3 client. > I suspect if you can't be reasonably sure about the integrity of your network traffic you have other problems anyway... one can run ntpd -s to get a similar function to ntpdate/sntp. But again, for 99% of installs as a client, auth and/or ntpv4 doesn't matter and much like sendmail/dma, one can always install ntp.org from ports if they require authentication (I've never seen it used). _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1J2pH_rS (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1J2pH_rS (FB_current)