Re: mtree acl support

看板FB_current作者時間12年前 (2014/01/16 13:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串3/7 (看更多)
On Jan 15, 2014, at 9:11 PM, Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> wrote: > = > On Jan 14, 2014, at 6:47 AM, Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org> wrote: > = >> I was recently talking to someone about how one would backup / restore >> ACLs reliably. I didn't see any mention of ACLs in the mtree man page >> and after a quick google I came upon this old mailing list post: >> = >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2008-April/024173.html >> = >> patch in list is here: http://heka.cenkes.org/sat/diffs/mtree_acl.diff >> I've mirrored it here: https://feld.me/freebsd/mtree_acl.diff >> = >> This old patch appears to still apply cleanly. I hate to see a patch die >> and be forgotten. > = > One problem that =91tar=92 has addressed (inspired by Joerg Schilling=92s > work on star) is to permit ACLs to be restored even if the user database > is out of date. > = > This is done by including a fourth field in each ACE with the > numeric user ID. > = > I suspect you want to do the same for mtree. I thought > I remembered acl_to_text having an option to use > an extended text format, so it might be a trivial change. Also, comparing ACLs using strcmp() seems a little odd to me. Tim _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1IrsxIC7 (FB_current)
文章代碼(AID): #1IrsxIC7 (FB_current)