Re: RFC: use EM_LEGACY_IRQ in if_lem.c ?

看板FB_current作者時間13年前 (2012/07/26 02:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串6/9 (看更多)
On 24 July 2012 13:20, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> wrote: > if_lem.c ("lem", one of the e1000 drivers) has 2 possible interrupt modes: > EM_LEGACY_IRQ uses the standard dispatch mechanism, whereas > FAST_INTR has a custom handler that signals a taskqueue to do the job. > > I have no idea which actual hardware uses it (all of my Intel 1G > cards use either "em" or "igb"), but "lem" is the driver used in > qemu, and there the EM_LEGACY_IRQ gives approx 10% higher packet > rates than the other. > > Any objections if i change the default to EM_LEGACY_IRQ ? I suggest doing some digging to understand why. I bet we all know the answer, but it would be nice to have it documented and investigated. I bet em(4) isn't the only device that would benefit from this? 2c, Adrian _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1G43HVLg (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1G43HVLg (FB_current)