Re: RFC: use EM_LEGACY_IRQ in if_lem.c ?

看板FB_current作者時間13年前 (2012/07/25 06:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串2/9 (看更多)
Interesting, lem is all the non-pcie hardware, and if you see better performance out of the LEGACY path then I'm OK with changing the default. Jack On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> wrote: > if_lem.c ("lem", one of the e1000 drivers) has 2 possible interrupt modes: > EM_LEGACY_IRQ uses the standard dispatch mechanism, whereas > FAST_INTR has a custom handler that signals a taskqueue to do the job. > > I have no idea which actual hardware uses it (all of my Intel 1G > cards use either "em" or "igb"), but "lem" is the driver used in > qemu, and there the EM_LEGACY_IRQ gives approx 10% higher packet > rates than the other. > > Any objections if i change the default to EM_LEGACY_IRQ ? > > cheers > luigi > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1G3o9YAp (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1G3o9YAp (FB_current)