Re: [ptrace] please review follow fork/exec changes

看板FB_current作者時間14年前 (2012/02/16 02:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串30/33 (看更多)
On 02/15/2012 08:32 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 02:50:45PM -0800, Dmitry Mikulin wrote: >>>>> It seems that now wait4(2) can be called from the real (non-debugger) >>>>> parent first and result in the call to proc_reap(), isn't it ? We would >>>>> then just reparent the child back to the caller, still leaving the >>>>> zombie and confusing debugger. >>>> When either gdb or the real parent gets to proc_reap() the process >>>> wouldn't >>>> get destroyed, it'll get caught by the following clause: >>>> if (p->p_oppid&& (t = pfind(p->p_oppid)) != NULL) { >>>> >>>> and the real parent with get the child back into the children's list while >>>> gdb will get it into the orphan list. The second time around when >>>> proc_reap() is entered, p->p_oppid will be 0 and the process will get >>>> really reaped. Does it make sense? And proc_reparent() attempts to keep >>>> the >>>> orphan list clean and not have the same entries and the list of siblings. >>> Right, this is what I figured. But I asked about some further implication >>> of this change: >>> >>> if real parent spuriosly calls wait4(2) on the child pid after the child >>> exited, but before the debugger called the wait4(), then exactly the >>> code you noted above will be run. This results in the child being fully >>> returned to the original parent. >>> >>> Next, the wait4() call from debugger gets an error, and zombie will be >>> kept around until parent calls wait4() for this pid once more. >>> >>> Am I missed something ? >> In this case the process will move from gdb's child list to gdb's orphan >> list when the real parent does a wait4(). Next time around the wait loop in >> gdb it'll be caught by the orphan's proc_reap(). > I do not see how the next debugger loop could find this process at all, > since the first wait4() call reparented it to the original parent. Not the debugger loop, the kern_wait() loop. The child get re-parented to the original parent but moves to the orphan list of the debugger process. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1FE_BWix (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1FE_BWix (FB_current)