Re: [ptrace] please review follow fork/exec changes

看板FB_current作者時間14年前 (2012/02/16 02:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串30/33 (看更多)
--VtOb4vV0nsUnkr3G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 02:50:45PM -0800, Dmitry Mikulin wrote: > >>>It seems that now wait4(2) can be called from the real (non-debugger) > >>>parent first and result in the call to proc_reap(), isn't it ? We would > >>>then just reparent the child back to the caller, still leaving the > >>>zombie and confusing debugger. > >>When either gdb or the real parent gets to proc_reap() the process=20 > >>wouldn't > >>get destroyed, it'll get caught by the following clause: > >> if (p->p_oppid&& (t =3D pfind(p->p_oppid)) !=3D NULL) { > >> > >>and the real parent with get the child back into the children's list wh= ile > >>gdb will get it into the orphan list. The second time around when > >>proc_reap() is entered, p->p_oppid will be 0 and the process will get > >>really reaped. Does it make sense? And proc_reparent() attempts to keep= =20 > >>the > >>orphan list clean and not have the same entries and the list of sibling= s. > >Right, this is what I figured. But I asked about some further implication > >of this change: > > > >if real parent spuriosly calls wait4(2) on the child pid after the child > >exited, but before the debugger called the wait4(), then exactly the > >code you noted above will be run. This results in the child being fully > >returned to the original parent. > > > >Next, the wait4() call from debugger gets an error, and zombie will be > >kept around until parent calls wait4() for this pid once more. > > > >Am I missed something ? >=20 > In this case the process will move from gdb's child list to gdb's orphan= =20 > list when the real parent does a wait4(). Next time around the wait loop = in=20 > gdb it'll be caught by the orphan's proc_reap(). I do not see how the next debugger loop could find this process at all, since the first wait4() call reparented it to the original parent. --VtOb4vV0nsUnkr3G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk873jQACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4g9UgCg3EUpfudY7esu+R4cGFrYauYh I7MAoKd6qEKZCGU7SXwWgKWL2kN77QdQ =QwmM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VtOb4vV0nsUnkr3G--
文章代碼(AID): #1FE_BW1p (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1FE_BW1p (FB_current)