Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1

看板FB_current作者時間14年前 (2011/12/30 20:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串111/124 (看更多)
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig06372F211F050191E1A075C6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 12/30/11 10:07, schrieb Mark Linimon: > On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 04:04:31PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: >> There maybe serious reasons having the Linuxulator, i do not know. But= >> if not, why spending rare developer resources on that? >=20 > This is a classical misunderstanding of the FreeBSD development model. >=20 > There is no "staff" standing around waiting for assignments, as with > a commercial company. When committers join the project, they usually > (almost always) already have a long list of things that they want to > work on. And then they go work on them. >=20 > Neither the core team, nor the FreeBSD Foundation, "direct" the project= > and its course of development. Some of the members of each do post > emails, or stand up in front of conferences, and say "you know, I think= > it would be really neat if someone did xyz." Sometimes this leads to > results, sometimes not. >=20 > As for the companies that have their own FreeBSD-derived products, > often their goals are tightly focused, e.g. "improve the number of > packets we can pass" or "support our specialized hardware". Some, > but not all, of the resultant work makes it back into FreeBSD. We > get to say "it would be really neat if ..."; and, in addition, point > to possible future minimization of merging and duplication of effort > as a way to save costs long-term. >=20 > But with these exceptions, development is primarily driven from the > bottom-up (individual committers find something they are interested in > working on, and then go work on it), and not the top-down as in "real" > companies. This is the way the overwhelming majority (90+%?) of the > work on FreeBSD gets done. >=20 > So, there's no one "assigned" the tasks of closing PRs, nor working on > coordinating code with the other BSDs, nor working on the Linuxolator, > nor even supporting high-performance computing. >=20 > It's a cooperative anarchy, not a hierarchy. >=20 > mcl By no maen is this what I said or intended to say. oliver --------------enig06372F211F050191E1A075C6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO/aU2AAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8WMYIAM/NQj1jolKrUBvNlQqLiWIn FCbkP3OoEZxEZ0h+g3Rvnw2HueHiH5NFPUGj5Aegel4RvhQzSefn8bWkX2xFUO6O bEQ21Zom0hjM2/FmJHAple8mbitb2Ev4pCSltaqYBImrXZPD7c90c34F6IH99SVa rjpFfd4vCAnZi7CFVbb0J7FfU6iKddNMxNzJDAlXLHn9R0loEsy8coID97Vd0f28 GDlJDYK1Rv0GOEfkGONgw3YrmlU5hL1kk7BPwei1hhWw1Jk65TF83EEcG63XvTJi AcmWE5GgHfJWCMPkEQjKkKgIaRF0kKenO0iIHwzsWFEvhV6FLKtOtIO7pAKdP+o= =bJIq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig06372F211F050191E1A075C6--
文章代碼(AID): #1E_QW1-m (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 111 之 124 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1E_QW1-m (FB_current)