Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1

On 15 Dec 2011 21:25, "Kevin Oberman" <kob6558@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On 15 December 2011 17:58, O. Hartmann <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
wrote:
> >> Since ZFS in Linux can only be achieved via FUSE (ad far as I know), it
> >> is legitimate to compare ZFS and ext4. It would be much more
competetive
> >> to compare Linux BTRFS and FreeBSD ZFS.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Er... does ext4 guarantee data integrity?
> >
> > You're not comparing like with like; please do some research on the
> > point of ZFS before asserting that they're fair comparisons.
> >
> > A fair(er) comparison could be ext4 with UFS+soft-updates.
>
> Wouldn't UFS+SUJ be the closest atch?

Yup. Thanks.

Chris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"