Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1

On Dec 15, 2011, at 3:25 PM, Stefan Esser wrote:

> Am 15.12.2011 11:10, schrieb Michael Larabel:
>> No, the same hardware was used for each OS.
>>=20
>> In terms of the software, the stock software stack for each OS was =
used.
>=20
> Just curious: Why did you choose ZFS on FreeBSD, while UFS2 (with
> journaling enabled) should be an obvious choice since it is more =
similar
> in concept to ext4 and since that is what most FreeBSD users will use
> with FreeBSD?

Or perhaps, since it is "server" Linux distribution, use ZFS on Linux as =
well. With identical tuning on both Linux and FreeBSD. Having the same =
FS used by both OS will help make the comparison more sensible for FS =
I/O.

Daniel=
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"