Re: Very imprecise watchdogd(8) timeout

看板FB_current作者時間14年前 (2011/09/19 21:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串9/9 (看更多)
on 16/09/2011 23:59 Arnaud Lacombe said the following: > in which case the current notifier-based architecture is broken. You > may want to have a soft-watchdog triggering after 5s, and a fallback > hardware watchdog triggering after 60s. So let's start with the real problem, FreeBSD watchdog infrastructure doesn't expose an API to do what you described above. I think that it would be a rather small part to change the representation of timeouts from current form to, say, value + unit encoding. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1ETpqF0d (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1ETpqF0d (FB_current)