Re: Very imprecise watchdogd(8) timeout

In message <CACqU3MV7mLD1Qrsd3c0cK2hjffErhBqTVbQXHHQ62r6-pn8uMA@mail.gmail.com>
, Arnaud Lacombe writes:

>>>I do not really care actually, but the manpage is wrong, and the code
>>>needlessly complicated.
>>
>> As I said: Feel free to improve.
>>
>How can I expect anything to get through, when I cannot even get an
>obvious use-after-free in the ipfw code fixed after months ? Or when
>I've been waiting to play with Warner's external compiler support
>patch for months ? Or when I can not get a build fix for 7-STABLE to
>get committed ? [and the list goes on...]

The oracle says:  Try next answer.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"