Re: Spam filters

On Tue, 4 Oct 2005 04:48:22 +0300
Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 23:02:36 +0200
> des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) wrote:
>=20
> > Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> writes:
> > > Aaron Holmes <evil@evildomain.org> wrote:
> > > > Any recomendations on good spam filters?
> > > Dspam [is] more accurate that spam assassin,with less resources
> > > and less work for the admin
> >=20
> > Dspam is designed to work as a local delivery agent; all email
> > addresses must map to a local user, and it delivers mail to an mbox
> > file (though there are patches to make it work with maildir).  For
> > more complex setups (IMAP server, virtual mailboxes / domains),

Just to clarify:
We've deployed a solution involving all above a week ago and some
months ago I've helped a 40k domains setup for a hosting company.

> > SpamAssassin is still the only practical alternative.

Moe mature - yes, maybe; more practical - I don't think so.

> Actually your information is outdated.
> It works very nice demonized as a content filter (LMTP/SMTP).

--=20
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

_______________________________________________
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"