Re: Spam filters

On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 23:02:36 +0200
des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) wrote:

> Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> writes:
> > Aaron Holmes <evil@evildomain.org> wrote:
> > > Any recomendations on good spam filters?
> > Dspam [is] more accurate that spam assassin,with less resources and
> > less work for the admin
>=20
> Dspam is designed to work as a local delivery agent; all email
> addresses must map to a local user, and it delivers mail to an mbox
> file (though there are patches to make it work with maildir).  For
> more complex setups (IMAP server, virtual mailboxes / domains),
> SpamAssassin is still the only practical alternative.

Actually your information is outdated.
It works very nice demonized as a content filter (LMTP/SMTP).

--=20
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

_______________________________________________
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"